- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So is the official stance of the sunshine pumpers on the QB situation. . . .
Posted on 10/22/12 at 11:41 am to Scoob
Posted on 10/22/12 at 11:41 am to Scoob
quote:
If Mett goes down, who's the next guy?
This is a legitimate concern. Our anemic offense doesn't allow us to put opponents away until the final minutes, so our backup QBs don't get any meaningful playing time.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 11:54 am to LouisianaLonghorn
quote:It's more than that. I still go back to the North Texas game, and Mett getting crushed. The way we rushed to get him back on the field gave me a big "uh-oh"; as it looked like the coaches had no intention of letting anyone else play. Now, is that because Mett needs all the work he can get, or because the next best guy is clearly much worse?
If Mett goes down, who's the next guy?
This is a legitimate concern. Our anemic offense doesn't allow us to put opponents away until the final minutes, so our backup QBs don't get any meaningful playing time.
Getting Mett more experience is needed, sure. But if you can't bear to let Rivers (or Bolden, or Randall) even run a few series against North Texas, toss the ball some, then things are a little scary in the depth chart.
Being afraid of losing Mettenberger mentally if he sits a series, if that's the reason (and I honestly don't know if it is or not), then that's bad too.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)