re: Paradise Lost 3

The reason why I commented is because I watched all three pretty recently and there wasn't a second when any irrefutable evidence was put in front of a jury that a logical person looks at and thinks these kids were guilty.

I remember specifically when the slow kid says it happens at a certain period of the day (day or night) and the interrogator specifically rephrases the question to make him commit to the actual story.

Maybe it's me but I just never felt like they got a fair trial originally. They just kept bringing the concept of being a cult kid and liking heavy metal to the jury as proof of a triple murder. That type of speculative evidence shouldn't be justifiable.