Started By
Message

re: Lance Armstrong was part of the most complex doping scheme ever...

Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:11 am to
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:11 am to
quote:


fricking Rats!!!

Snitches get stitches!!!

Would you lie under oath to save a friend? These guys were all subpeonaed, none of them ratted out Armstrong voluntarily.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
53674 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:15 am to
Well, that's what doesn't make sense to me. It wasn't yet a civil lawsuit I don't think, so how did they have subpoena power? Weren't these dudes just threatened with lifetime bans to get testimony? Even if so, one or two guys could be discredited, but not a dozen.

It's strange that the ADA could prove a case, but not the government. That's why I buy the theory that the government dropped the case due to politics.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78354 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Another truth is Travis Tygart, CEO of USADA, was involved in meetings conducted by Novitzky during the FDA’s investigation, which as stated above, failed to have formal charges filed against Armstrong. The FDA then gave its evidence to USADA, a non-profit, non-governmental agency, which then accused Armstrong of doping violations in a charging letter U.S. District Court Judge, Sam Sparks called “so vague and unhelpful it would not pass muster in any court in the United States.”




quote:

After the FDA failed to persuade the federal grand jury to file a single criminal indictment against Lance Armstrong, and the US Attorney dropped the case, all that evidence obtained by the FDA during its criminal investigation made its way to Travis Tygart and USADA.

USADA’s evidentiary threshold is far less stringent than the FDA’s because it is not subject the rules that governed the FDA’s criminal investigation. US District Court Judge Sam Sparks stated in his opinion dismissing Armstrong’s lawsuit against USADA and Tygart that “the deficiency of USADA’s charging document is of serious constitutional concern.”


LINK
Posted by Interception
Member since Nov 2008
11089 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 11:05 am to
(no message)
Posted by Interception
Member since Nov 2008
11089 posts
Posted on 10/11/12 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Would you lie under oath to save a friend? These guys were all subpeonaed, none of them ratted out Armstrong voluntarily.




You're an idiot. I see you can't detect sarcasm?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram