- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lance Armstrong was part of the most complex doping scheme ever...
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:11 am to Interception
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:11 am to Interception
quote:
fricking Rats!!!
Snitches get stitches!!!
Would you lie under oath to save a friend? These guys were all subpeonaed, none of them ratted out Armstrong voluntarily.
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:15 am to trackfan
Well, that's what doesn't make sense to me. It wasn't yet a civil lawsuit I don't think, so how did they have subpoena power? Weren't these dudes just threatened with lifetime bans to get testimony? Even if so, one or two guys could be discredited, but not a dozen.
It's strange that the ADA could prove a case, but not the government. That's why I buy the theory that the government dropped the case due to politics.
It's strange that the ADA could prove a case, but not the government. That's why I buy the theory that the government dropped the case due to politics.
Posted on 10/11/12 at 10:24 am to trackfan
quote:
Another truth is Travis Tygart, CEO of USADA, was involved in meetings conducted by Novitzky during the FDA’s investigation, which as stated above, failed to have formal charges filed against Armstrong. The FDA then gave its evidence to USADA, a non-profit, non-governmental agency, which then accused Armstrong of doping violations in a charging letter U.S. District Court Judge, Sam Sparks called “so vague and unhelpful it would not pass muster in any court in the United States.”
quote:
After the FDA failed to persuade the federal grand jury to file a single criminal indictment against Lance Armstrong, and the US Attorney dropped the case, all that evidence obtained by the FDA during its criminal investigation made its way to Travis Tygart and USADA.
USADA’s evidentiary threshold is far less stringent than the FDA’s because it is not subject the rules that governed the FDA’s criminal investigation. US District Court Judge Sam Sparks stated in his opinion dismissing Armstrong’s lawsuit against USADA and Tygart that “the deficiency of USADA’s charging document is of serious constitutional concern.”
LINK
Posted on 10/11/12 at 11:07 am to trackfan
quote:
Would you lie under oath to save a friend? These guys were all subpeonaed, none of them ratted out Armstrong voluntarily.
You're an idiot. I see you can't detect sarcasm?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News