And the PI call against KamBam that extended and allowed the GB touchdown drive to happen was what exactly?

By the way, to those saying you have to have more than just your hands on the ball... Tyrone Prothro of Alabama disagrees with you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53imC4zojfc

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Eighteen

Member since Dec 2006

34127 posts

Posted on 9/26/12 at 3:31 pm to PurpleReignUW

quote:
First of all, Tate's hands touched the ball first, before Jennings' did, and secondly, it does not matter what happened in the air, as possession is not obtained by a defender until he touches the ground, and by then, both Tate and Jennings had a grasp on the ball.

well the NFL rulebook disagrees with you

the rule states "control of the ball" not a "completed catch of the ball"

you fricking won, why are you trying to defend this? its one thing to say the Seahwaks deserved to win the game...I can be on board with that

I am not on board with you saying that last play was the right call

quote:
Tyrone Prothro of Alabama disagrees with you:

that catch has nothing to do with "simultaneous possession" in any way, shape or form

This post was edited on 9/26/12 at 3:33 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by graychef

Member since Jun 2008

28375 posts

Posted on 9/26/12 at 3:39 pm to PurpleReignUW

quote:
By the way, to those saying you have to have more than just your hands on the ball... Tyrone Prothro of Alabama disagrees with you:

Prothro was the only one in possession of that ball. What's the comparison?

quote:
And the PI call against KamBam that extended and allowed the GB touchdown drive to happen was what exactly?

And the 3rd and forever defensive PI call where Rice shoved the DB to get leverage was what? Besides, these are judgment calls. As bad as they are, they are judgments. Possession is not.

C'mon, man.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by GeauxWarTigers