quote:
Get ready guys. This is the third similar article just in the last two days, way before LSU and Bama even meet for the first time. They are laying the groundwork for Mulligan II (if Bama loses in Nov., of course) so it won't seem so surprising if/when announced later. "Eyeball tests" and "best losses" criteria will be soon to follow.

Yet when posters like myself stated Mulligan I would be bad for CFB, I was called a kook for even suggesting Mulligan II could happen.

Make no mistake about it, IF LSU wins on 11/3, this will be pushed if no other media darling is unbeaten.

Again, as I've stated a million times before here:

LSU's new standard now is beating Bama twice in a season, while they only need to beat us once.

The CFB regular season is already irrelevant. 2011 did this...not 2014.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Baloo

Formerly MDGeaux

Member since Sep 2003

49645 posts

Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:40 pm to EZE Tiger Fan

quote:
Yet when posters like myself stated Mulligan I would be bad for CFB, I was called a kook for even suggesting Mulligan II could happen.

I thought you were a kook ad last year was a one time thing, particularly with how they changed the postseason in the wake of the game. But... man. You may have a point.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Schooter

Ft. Myers, FL

Member since Feb 2012

516 posts

Posted on 9/18/12 at 3:49 pm to EZE Tiger Fan

quote:
I was called a kook for even suggesting Mulligan II could happen.

I've thought it was a realistic possibility since 01/09. I've also been influenced by my unquenchable desire for epic payback for beating those aholes twice.

But, I think it'll be FSU bc the ACC is terrible. FSU will smoke Clemson. Auburn played Clemson within inches of ther lives. I know Clemson didn't have Watkins but still, Auburn is atrocious.

0 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board