Started By
Message

re: Bonnette: No meeting between Miles and TM7 last night

Posted on 8/15/12 at 2:09 pm to
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26442 posts
Posted on 8/15/12 at 2:09 pm to
This (the TP report and then the Bonnette denial tweets) is confusing to me...


If there was a meeting, what is the reasoning for denying it? And also, if they were going to deny it, who told kleinpeter that there was a meeting in the first place?

The way this story is filtering through the media is so bizarre.

When you talk about someone getting played here, who is getting played? I'm trying to figure out what everyone's motives are here.

I thought this is what everyone wanted:

LSU/Miles - transfer to Mcneese
TM - stay at LSU
TM family - transfer to Nicholls

Are LSU/Miles a completely different "party" altogether?
This post was edited on 8/15/12 at 2:13 pm
Posted by bdevill
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2008
11818 posts
Posted on 8/15/12 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

what is the reasoning for denying it?


If there was a meeting and it resulted in Mathieu not returning, what's the point of discussing the meeting?

If there was a meeting and the results of the discussion are still being reviewed, what's the point of announcing there was a meeting, getting everyone's hopes up, and then have the bubble bust when it's determined that things didn't work out.

If there is any negotiation going on, imho, no news is good news for Tiger fans that want Mathieu back. But you just can't get your hopes up at this point. I mean, it's kind of obvious that no one knows for certain what will happen yet.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram