- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Milk: Skim, 1%, 2%, or Whole?
Posted on 8/7/12 at 8:28 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Posted on 8/7/12 at 8:28 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
2%
Posted on 8/7/12 at 10:26 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Lactose intolerant.... Womp Womp
Posted on 8/7/12 at 11:33 pm to LouisianaLady
quote:
Enjoy your osteoporosis.
I can't tell you how wrong this is. I know it's spread by the government and every dairy ad and agency, but humans do not need milk from any other animals, and do not need breastmilk past 3 years old or so.
LINK /
LINK /
In a nutshell, cow's milk was designed, by nature, for calves (baby bovine). Not humans. Sure, some here and there isn't bad, and possibly could be beneficial.. but cow's milk is far from a necessity in the human diet, and more and more research is showing that dairy milk is actually working against preventing osteoporosis.
Posted on 8/8/12 at 8:32 am to Hulkklogan
Drank 2% for years and have been drinking 1% for the last 2 or 3 years. I don't really taste a difference but I can not drink skim milk no matter what. Tried Almond milk and didn't care for it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News