Started By
Message
locked post

Chad Ford Mock Draft 7.0

Posted on 6/13/12 at 1:38 pm
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27447 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 1:38 pm
Still has us taking Davis and Sullinger

1. Davis
2. Robinson
3. MKG
4. Beal
5. Drummond
6. Lillard
7. Barnes
8. Waiters
9. Henson
10. Sullinger
Posted by jmy10436
bucktown
Member since Mar 2012
96 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 1:40 pm to
Would you take Sullinger over Rivers?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96897 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 1:50 pm to
Ugh.

I don't see the point in getting Sullinger unless we're shipping out Oak, Ayon, or Smith for assets.

I'd rather have Rivers, Ross, or Meyers Leonard than Sullinger.
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4452 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 1:59 pm to
Id rather PJ3 or Rivers
Posted by saintstigasbees504
Member since May 2012
14 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 2:19 pm to
if the draft shakes out like this, i take rivers or pj3 (only if he shows he can play the 3, which he has not at this point).... do not want sullinger.

worst case scenario is if drummond, barnes (not at all likely to be there at 10 anyway), rivers and lillard go before 10.
Posted by saintstigasbees504
Member since May 2012
14 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Still has us taking Davis and Sullinger 1. Davis 2. Robinson 3. MKG 4. Beal 5. Drummond 6. Lillard 7. Barnes 8. Waiters 9. Henson 10. Sullinger


now that i think about it..... i would see about trading up to 6 in this scenario to draft barnes.
Posted by The Future
Smallville, KS
Member since Oct 2009
22661 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 6:13 pm to
Please god no.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64647 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

Sullinger


anti fap
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30237 posts
Posted on 6/13/12 at 8:19 pm to
With Ayon, Oak, Smith, Davis and Landry, aren't we pretty crowded at PF and C? Why would we take another big at 10?

I like JJ and Vasquez as much as the next guy, but Rivers and Lilliard could turn out to be top notch scorers and/or valued assets at the guard position(s), especially with potential injury issues with Gordon.

Posted by jmy10436
bucktown
Member since Mar 2012
96 posts
Posted on 6/14/12 at 2:25 pm to
Sacramento won't take drummond at #5.
LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram