- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
How meaningful are STARS? Player evaluations
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:27 am
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:27 am
How much do ya'll really put into the rivals scout and 24/7 class ranking? I personally don't think it mean much of anything talent is talent and how you develop once you get to your school comes down to your effort and the coach coaching you. I could give a crap if rivals ranked you as the best running back in the country....Byrce Brown......Should we care if Alabama is ranked ahead of us in these dam recruiting ranking?
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:40 am to BigZinMetry
they are ranked in a star system based on athletic ability, size, and potential at the next level. Statistically, the best teams have had the best recruiting classes so it gives a decent representation of the talent coming in. They can't predict who will succeed in college because they don't know what drives an 18 year old to push themselves. Thats why you see some 5 star talents flop and 2/3 stars blossom.
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:43 am to BigZinMetry
Rankings are definitely relevant, stars are over played.
The difference between the highest 4 star and the lowest 5 star is pretty much nil, but fans would MUCH rather have the lowest 5 star.
The difference between the highest 4 star and the lowest 5 star is pretty much nil, but fans would MUCH rather have the lowest 5 star.
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:46 am to BigZinMetry
quote:
I personally don't think it mean much of anything talent is talent
Not to sound like a smart arse or Bill Clinton, but it depends on what you mean by meaning. A ranking doesn't guarentee anything, its just an evaluation at certain time. There are a million and one factors that will determine whether a 5 * RB becomes B Brown or Trent Richardson. Certainly some 5 stars will bust and some 3 or 2 stars will become stars, but a higher percentage of 5* are stars than 3's. One problem is, there is no where to go but down for a 5 *, so if he's not a star player, people lash out at the rankings using 20/20 hindsight.
quote:
......Should we care if Alabama is ranked ahead of us in these dam recruiting ranking?
The top 2 classes in 2009 were Alabama and LSU. Look at the past team rankings and you see a lot of teams in the top 5 recruiting rankings competeing for the NC 2-3 years down the line. Again, its not a guarentee, a top ranking team can flop and a lesser ranked team can do well. But overall, a higher percentage of teams ranked in the top 5 had top 5 classes than #35 classes.
Posted on 6/12/12 at 9:47 am to BigZinMetry
You can't put too much into the star/ranking system. It's a good guide, but not a hard line rule.
I don't put much of anything into the class rankings. Not a lot seperates the top ten ranked schools and hardly anything seperates the top five. There probably is a bigger difference between the school ranked #5 and ranked #25 though.
As for the individual player rankings, its a guess, albeit usually an educated guess, but its still a good guideline. Not a Rule.
I don't put much of anything into the class rankings. Not a lot seperates the top ten ranked schools and hardly anything seperates the top five. There probably is a bigger difference between the school ranked #5 and ranked #25 though.
As for the individual player rankings, its a guess, albeit usually an educated guess, but its still a good guideline. Not a Rule.
Posted on 6/12/12 at 10:08 am to BigZinMetry
quote:Gave Bama an extra National Title and made a t-shirt printer there very rich..
How meaningful are STARS?
quote:Very meaningful. Let's school know about players they may not have access to.
Player evaluations
Posted on 6/12/12 at 11:04 am to BigZinMetry
Posted on 6/12/12 at 3:09 pm to BigZinMetry
Its not exact, but is a good judge, not much diff in top 10-8 classes really. Sites also dont take into account recruiting for needs. We could sign 22 5 star wrs and have a high ranking, but we wont win shite on the field.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)