- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: **OFFICIAL** Pelicans Thread
Posted on 12/4/12 at 10:10 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 12/4/12 at 10:10 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
What work do you want me to acknowledge as good? The Pelicans was always the likely choice , anyone with some common sense knew that. I am not trying to take credit for the story. I'm just telling what I said then about the article and how it shouldn't have been assumed Benson bought those names. it was stupid to run with the angels & demons names and pass them off as the 2 choices. But of course is expected the huge ego like all the other douches on the site. Can't admit to being wrong, just want all the credit for being "right"
Nothing to be done. Keep mudslinging.
Keep sifting through good stuff, find what you thing is bad, and cling to it so you can hold it up for anyone who you can convince to look.
You clearly do not see at least the writers you interact with admit there errors or try to get better for the benefit of the team and city. You see it as ego. That is fine. It will color everything you see.
Enjoy.
I still haven't seen any refutation of my original point of interjecting, so just keep beating the same drum, the same `mistake' over and over while not admitting your own error about the credit taking and more.
Posted on 12/4/12 at 10:20 pm to 42
So you are saying there are no egos present?
Lol.
I never got the point of people referring back to articles when sonething proves true.
"Hey look who said it first!!!"
How would you describe that?
Is that a way to justify to the audience that you are reading credible information?
Is it ego? It sure comes off that way.
I really wouldn't have a problem with it if they hasn't bombed on the original names
Lol.
I never got the point of people referring back to articles when sonething proves true.
"Hey look who said it first!!!"
How would you describe that?
Is that a way to justify to the audience that you are reading credible information?
Is it ego? It sure comes off that way.
I really wouldn't have a problem with it if they hasn't bombed on the original names
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)