- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Q & A With NFLPA’s DeMaurice Smith
Posted on 3/30/12 at 4:14 pm to SaintEB
Posted on 3/30/12 at 4:14 pm to SaintEB
Another LINK about this.
Just a couple of highlights:
This begs the question...if there is no evidence turned over that the players were involved in a "pay-to-injure", are the suspensions of the front office people unsubstantiated?
Just a couple of highlights:
quote:
As of yet, they haven't turned over anything that we would consider to be direct evidence of player involvement in a 'pay-to-injure' scheme that we could consider for discipline."
quote:
"It's a very, at least from our perspective, a very unfair situation where you have a number of allegations floating back and forth in the press," Smith told the website. "There certainly appears to be some information that's been provided to the media about certain individuals' involvement and references to everything from emails to Powerpoints. It's difficult for those players to be in a situation where they can hardly defend themselves from unsubstantiated accusations that are being made in the public.
This begs the question...if there is no evidence turned over that the players were involved in a "pay-to-injure", are the suspensions of the front office people unsubstantiated?
Posted on 3/30/12 at 5:08 pm to SaintEB
quote:
This begs the question...if there is no evidence turned over that the players were involved in a "pay-to-injure", are the suspensions of the front office people unsubstantiated?
That's exactly what I'm thinking. It certainly gives SP and Vitt and potential bargaining chip for their appeals.
Posted on 3/30/12 at 5:21 pm to SaintEB
quote:
This begs the question...if there is no evidence turned over that the players were involved in a "pay-to-injure", are the suspensions of the front office people unsubstantiated?
The longer this whole mess drags out, the more questions will be raised. If any players are to be punished it also has to go through the NFLPA. If you have hard evidence release what it is and lets get on with it.
The way this is being dragged out leads me to believe that what they have is not so concrete and just maybe God-dell over reacted due to the media out bursts. If no evidence comes out to justify the situation the NFL may just have this whole thing blow up in their face.
Now would that not be sweet.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)