- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 70% of supermarket ground beef contains "pink slime"
Posted on 3/8/12 at 1:01 pm to simbo
Posted on 3/8/12 at 1:01 pm to simbo
quote:
DR.'s all around the world support the studies and claims
Then why can't I find PI's all over the world with similar published studies? Just the book you linked.
I found this...
quote:
Processed meat intake may be involved in the etiology of colorectal cancer, a major cause of death in affluent countries. The epidemiologic studies published to date conclude that the excess risk in the highest category of processed meat-eaters is comprised between 20% and 50% compared with non-eaters. In addition, the excess risk per gram of intake is clearly higher than that of fresh red meat. Several hypotheses, which are mainly based on studies carried out on red meat, may explain why processed meat intake is linked to cancer risk
And this...
quote:
However, the risk of developing CRC is well recognised to be associated not only with diet but also with obesity and lack of exercise. While epidemiological evidence shows an association with factors such as high red meat intake and low intake of vegetables, fibre and fish,
And this...
quote:
Consumption of traditional soups, meat, salted and dried fish, cold cuts and seasoned cheeses, as well as the intake of animal proteins and nitrites were related to an increased GC risk. On the contrary consumption of fresh fruit, citrus fruit, raw vegetables, spices, garlic and olive oil, and vitamin C, E and beta-carotene intake were found to be protective factors.
In other words, most published data indicates an increased risk of cancer from the overall diet, not just meat ingestion. High levels of meat ingestion, combined with preventative factors like fish, vegs, fruit, doesn't equal an increased cancer risk.
This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 3/8/12 at 1:06 pm to MSMHater
The China Study was prompted off of tons of other research, largely ignored in the 40s and 50s that showed animal protein could in effect turn on and off tumor growth in mice. Looking at that research, prompted the DR.'s in the study to undertake the China Study.
Take a look at the movie Forks over Knives.....it details The China Study and other research linking animal protein to tumor growth.
And BTW, it has nothing to do with how it's cooked.
And I'm not going to argue over it. People can believe what they want.
Take a look at the movie Forks over Knives.....it details The China Study and other research linking animal protein to tumor growth.
And BTW, it has nothing to do with how it's cooked.
And I'm not going to argue over it. People can believe what they want.
This post was edited on 3/8/12 at 1:09 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News