Started By
Message

re: NCAA Playoffs Look Like A Reality in 2014

Posted on 2/26/12 at 4:02 pm to
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59135 posts
Posted on 2/26/12 at 4:02 pm to
That's really not a bad plan, and i agree 8 is too many, as long as its not just the 6 BCS conferences get an AQ. If you could, take the top 6 conference winners as long as they are in the top say 12-15, so no unranked UConn gets in for winning the Big East. If you don't have 6 top 12-15 conference winners, then the next non conference winners get in.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424008 posts
Posted on 2/26/12 at 4:04 pm to
you can do the same thing with the 4-team playoff

top 2 conference champs + the remaining top 2 teams
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
6932 posts
Posted on 2/26/12 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

That's really not a bad plan, and i agree 8 is too many, as long as its not just the 6 BCS conferences get an AQ. If you could, take the top 6 conference winners as long as they are in the top say 12-15, so no unranked UConn gets in for winning the Big East. If you don't have 6 top 12-15 conference winners, then the next non conference winners get in.


Well in theory i agree with you...but putting the rankings into the automatic bids goes against the "you didn't tell us what we needed to do" argument. for instance, as shitty as it is that conference tourney winners get automatic bids to the NCAA tourney, you don't get bitching from the reg season champ because the rules were clear from the beginning. if there is not objective criteria, there will continue to be an uproar. And granted this doesn't satisfy the midmajor crowd, but it's a start.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram