Started By
Message

re: LSU: weak in the QB stable

Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:34 am to
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
90042 posts
Posted on 1/31/12 at 11:34 am to
quote:

You're introducing the strawman fallacy in your post: I never said any QB on the roster will be "bad"



Hmmm...yeah, you never said 'bad', but "an unacceptable liability", and "Why is LSU constantly plagued at the most critical position?" might be worse than just saying they are bad.


quote:

seriously, after Mett we have basically an average bunch of horses in the stable, and I'm including all recent committments. And the scary thing is, we really haven't seen enough of Mett. And this is, in my opinion, an unacceptable liability to a program such as LSU's, or should be given the $ being paid to *CLM. Were there truly no prospects in the country (or elsewhere) interested in LSU remaining after GK decommited?

Why is LSU constantly plagued at the most critical position? And I'm talking since Tommy Hodson days.



quote:

based on the information I have, I can't say they will be good






first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram