- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Landon Collins Mom Accuses Saban Offering Job to LC's Girlfriend
Posted on 1/30/12 at 12:38 pm to melonheadla
Posted on 1/30/12 at 12:38 pm to melonheadla
quote:
As per Al.com. Such is NOT an NCAA violation, though!
How could it be anything but a violation? It's tantamount to providing money directly to the player in return for his commitment. The girlfriend in question merely acts as an illicit conduit for the funds. The cash passes from the athletic department to the girlfriend to her beloved, the recruiting prospect. It's entirely foreseeable that wages paid to the girlfriend are going to materially benefit the recruit. Why isn't that an illegal benefit? It's seems like the case for a violation is especially strong where (a) the AD/coach in question knows that the young lady is dating a highly coveted prospect; (b) the AD/coach offers or promises the job to the romantic interest before the prospect makes his final enrollment determination; (c) and the AD/coach does so with the transparent intention of inducing the prospect to commit to his institution. If that isn't a violation, then the NCAA should revisit its regulations. Form shouldn't trump substance. That's paying players.
Posted on 1/30/12 at 12:43 pm to The312
quote:Offering jobs to girlfriends/spouses, etc. is specifically addressed in the ncaa bylaws. Its illegal in basketball recruiting but not in football. Go figure.
The312
Posted on 1/30/12 at 1:08 pm to The312
quote:
How could it be anything but a violation? It's tantamount to providing money directly to the player in return for his commitment.
If auburn didn't get in trouble for paying cam's dad "without cam's knowledge", then they ain't got shite on the LC situation. Aight?
Posted on 1/30/12 at 1:49 pm to The312
quote:
How could it be anything but a violation? It's tantamount to providing money directly to the player in return for his commitment. The girlfriend in question merely acts as an illicit conduit for the funds. The cash passes from the athletic department to the girlfriend to her beloved, the recruiting prospect. It's entirely foreseeable that wages paid to the girlfriend are going to materially benefit the recruit. Why isn't that an illegal benefit? It's seems like the case for a violation is especially strong where (a) the AD/coach in question knows that the young lady is dating a highly coveted prospect; (b) the AD/coach offers or promises the job to the romantic interest before the prospect makes his final enrollment determination; (c) and the AD/coach does so with the transparent intention of inducing the prospect to commit to his institution. If that isn't a violation, then the NCAA should revisit its regulations. Form shouldn't trump substance. That's paying players
Do you have any idea how much these kids get paid to work in the athletic department? It's very very little and it's also public record since its a state institution. Therefore they would be stupid to pay her any more than anyone else with the freedom of information act requiring open book keeping.
So if this girl wants to work for free to put a couple hundred bucks in her boyfriends pockets every other week, instead of having money of her own, then that shite is on her dumbass.
It's amazing the cockamamie bullshite people will cook up when their are butthurt about their football team.
:Nb4ATPB:
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)