Started By
Message

re: We filled our needs

Posted on 1/23/12 at 7:11 pm to
Posted by Section225
Member since Jun 2011
3697 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 7:11 pm to
When I said defensive end/tackle tweener I mean DT. This class needs a big DL like Brockers that could play either.

I follow LSU recruiting yearly and its seems as though this year the staff has just been lazy. We are seeing right now with these top guys who we try to get in on late turning us down. Why didnt we go after these guys from the start like most schools have and build a long relationship with instead of a few weeks? Miles has banked on just trying to get by on LA talent alone to much. We should go after national guys harder first along with the top tier instate guys and leave the offers for low to mid range guys at the end of the year.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32154 posts
Posted on 1/23/12 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

When I said defensive end/tackle tweener I mean DT. This class needs a big DL like Brockers that could play either.



LOL Im an idiot I know a lot of times peopel want to move the bigger ends like allen over to the offensive side of the ball....I can agree with that and wish we had gotten a bigger guy. Thats really my one worry going into the season is who will fill brockers role.

quote:

Miles has banked on just trying to get by on LA talent alone to much.


Yeah IMO it seems that its a down year for LA guys. I mean we lost Collins and Devall didnt fit our system and we got everyone else we wanted. Usually if you do that you end up being ok but this year its slightly dissapointing. IMO this staff has been set up generally to focus on LA-Frank WIlson Ensminger etc. and we lost our OOS guy when Billy G left.
This post was edited on 1/23/12 at 7:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram