re: Saban is making us quit

quote:

---

You are stupid even by gump standards.

bama is the only team to be allowed to avenge a loss to a division rival in the bcs game. The voting methodology was changed for Bama. The Game of the Century which bama lost at home was rendered meaningless for Bama. The sec championship was rendered meaningless just for Bama. The Big12 champ was locked out just for Bama. And the bcs ratings took a hit bc of Bama. It was bad college football. Yet it was all done for your team.

Your team got a handout, and youre too stupid to understand why the fans of other teams might be a bit resentful.

---

I don't think much of secfan123's posts but before you claim someone is stupid, make sure your own posts aren't full of BS. Specifically, NO methodology was changed to put Bama and LSU into a rematch.

Conference championships and conference affiliation have NEVER been part of the BCS championship game. The BCS title game has ALWAYS been to pit the best two teams against regardless of conference standings - and they got it right. Bama and LSU were the two best teams in the nation. I've read the rules several times. The rules were clearly written to allow two teams from the same conference to play. There is an entire section about how a 3rd team from the same conference can get a BCS bowl bid if it is the conference champion and if the two teams in the NC game are from the same conference. Clearly, that means they planned for the possibility of a TWO teams playing from the SAME conference when NEITHER won their conference.