- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: do you want dual-threat or drop back QB?
Posted on 1/12/12 at 5:42 am to WNCTiger
Posted on 1/12/12 at 5:42 am to WNCTiger
Dual threat versus Drop back is a false distinction.
If a player is a true dual threat then of course you want that. Who says I only want a player that does only one aspect of his position well.
Aaron Rogers is one of the most accurate quarterbacks we have seen in a while. . .but what makes him other-wordly is his ability to extend when the play breaks down. Tom Brady has been incredible for the Pats. . .but you don't think they wish he had wheels against the Giants in the Super Bowl a few years back?
This thread seems to imply that we had the choice the last few years between a true dual threat and a drop back passer. That is not correct.
Also, it is easier to find a game-manager (which is just another way of saying average) than a true dual-threat.
The beauty of the game-manager is that when their teams win they get overrated because their mistakes weren't costly (See M. Mauck national championship game or G. McElroy national championship game)
If a player is a true dual threat then of course you want that. Who says I only want a player that does only one aspect of his position well.
Aaron Rogers is one of the most accurate quarterbacks we have seen in a while. . .but what makes him other-wordly is his ability to extend when the play breaks down. Tom Brady has been incredible for the Pats. . .but you don't think they wish he had wheels against the Giants in the Super Bowl a few years back?
This thread seems to imply that we had the choice the last few years between a true dual threat and a drop back passer. That is not correct.
Also, it is easier to find a game-manager (which is just another way of saying average) than a true dual-threat.
The beauty of the game-manager is that when their teams win they get overrated because their mistakes weren't costly (See M. Mauck national championship game or G. McElroy national championship game)
Posted on 1/12/12 at 6:01 am to LSUQ
Dual-threat = someone who can't throw and read defenses.
I'll take pro style please.
I'll take pro style please.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News