- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
Recommend a pair of binoculars.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 12/27/11 at 5:14 pm
money means nothing to me.
go.
go.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 5:21 pm to aldawg2323
Posted on 12/27/11 at 5:47 pm to aldawg2323
Swarovski if money is no option. Nikon if it is.
Posted on 12/27/11 at 7:29 pm to aldawg2323
quote:
money means nothing to me.
Swarovski
Posted on 12/27/11 at 9:43 pm to aldawg2323
instead of brand I give you this:
If you care about maximum light gathering, the objective divided by the magnification should be 7 if you are a young man (or woman), 5 if older then 50. This will only occur at night when your eyes are fully night-adjusted. It matches the exit image size & light gathering is maximized when that size equals your dilated pupil.
That is why the classic binocular size was 7x50.
If you care about maximum light gathering, the objective divided by the magnification should be 7 if you are a young man (or woman), 5 if older then 50. This will only occur at night when your eyes are fully night-adjusted. It matches the exit image size & light gathering is maximized when that size equals your dilated pupil.
That is why the classic binocular size was 7x50.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)