Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

I could not resist.....FSBO vs. Using a Listing Agent Statistics

Posted on 12/12/11 at 9:40 am
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 9:40 am
quote:

The method most used to sell a home has changed in recent years. A higher share of sellers are relying on the expertise of real estate agents and brokers to sell their home, rather than trying other methods.

From 1991 to 2011 the share of home sellers who used a real estate agent or broker to sell their home increased from 77 percent to 87 percent.
Over the same time period, the share of sellers who sold their home as a FSBO (For-Sale-By-Owner) decreased from 19 percent to 10 percent.
Sellers use real estate professionals to help them sell their home in a reasonable timeframe, to market their home to potential buyers, and to price the home competitively.




Source: NAR
Posted by I Love Bama
Alabama
Member since Nov 2007
38423 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Source: NAR



Shank.......































Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Source: NAR


I used to closely follow the public pronouncements of Lawrence Yun. Good times.

Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:11 am to


what? are you saying Lawrence Yun likes to "cook the books?"
This post was edited on 12/12/11 at 10:15 am
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:18 am to
I don't know about that, but man, he was truly willing to say anything regardless of the evidence. He as about like Baghdad Bob.

Here's a blog that used to only follow him.

LINK
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 12/12/11 at 10:32 am to
Well he is a paid lobbiest/economist for the real estate industry so it is his job to dress up the facts and find any morsel of good news out of tracking statistics.

That being said, that blog is Too bad it stopped in 2009....
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 8:37 am to
BUMP

Jersey, the timing could not have been better. Take a look at this link about NAR having to revise YEARS of home sales statistics. I wonder if your linked blog will fire back up as a result?

quote:

One of the most crucial and closely watched measures of the housing market is the existing home sales number, which is published monthly by the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

This figure, which is revised modestly each month, is about to get the mother of all revisions.

Apparently, the NAR mistakenly included some new homes sales figures and double counted some of the existing home sales figures.

This means that the health of the housing market for the last five years has actually been weaker than we thought.


Read more: LINK
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 9:22 am to
This comes as a surprise to no one who actually cares about such things outside of the NAR and realtors probably.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133674 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 9:26 am to
I realize this is localized anecdotal observation but several houses near me in the Highland Road area south of LSU initially went up FSBO.

After a couple of months of not selling they switched to a realtor. At least one of them sold within a few weeks after that.

These are houses in the $750,000+ range.
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:09 am to
LINK

This story is running rampant all over the news...I am very interested to see what the revised numbers look like.

It also begs the question, could this be on purpose as an election year tactic? Maybe?
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Jersey, the timing could not have been better.


Yes, hilarious!
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:11 am to
Is the NAR openly Dem/Republican? I didn't even know that. If so they're firmly past zero credibility and into negative credibility. Honestly though, that's probably been the case for years (for me).
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21082 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:15 am to
no, definitely not. in fact, they make it a point to always support candidates who support the "Realtor Party" which of course means those who fall in line with NAR positions on housing and finance topics

BUT, the timing on this is still a little weird to me. I cannot seem to find where Yun was "called out" or something similar recently which would make NAR have to re-publish stats
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 12/14/11 at 10:23 am to
quote:

I cannot seem to find where Yun was "called out" or something similar recently which would make NAR have to re-publish stats


Frankly, it's surprising to me that someone wasn't on top of this sooner. There's so many wonky blogs now digging around in the data.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram