- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The BCS MANIPULATION
Posted on 12/8/11 at 10:47 pm to wahoocs
Posted on 12/8/11 at 10:47 pm to wahoocs
I rushed my listing (as the awful writing reveals). I really just wanted to make a few points and got carried away.
The critical goal is to end affirmative action in college football, and step 2 is vital. Boise State and other wannabees simply have not earned a shot at LSU or Alabama or other BCS teams. This is not a game of monopoly. It is big time college football, which has millions of devoted fans who donate money and attend or follow games religiously and players who have staked their athletic gifts and struggles on going with a big time program to gain entrance to the pros.
Boise players chose not to take the chance to go to a big time program and risk never playing. Boise State ain't devoted. They could be if they recruited better. They could be if they refused to play crummy teams. I am sick of flashes in the pan rather than a team like Stanford grinding its way to prominence, assuming the PAC 12 is a grind. Still, the PAC 12 is a gauntlet compared to Boise's conference. Think Boise can go undefeated in the PAC 12? No way. And Boise knows it.
I could go on, but I will stop boring people on this point.
Playoffs reduce the regular season, which actually is the most important part of college football. Regular season games must be limited due to the risk of injury during playoffs. But the struggling, cheap, and chump conferences don’t want to agree to increased scholarships so that LSU would be two deep at the critical positions. LSU would have at least two big, fast option quarterbacks of equal ability every year.
Nuff for now.
The critical goal is to end affirmative action in college football, and step 2 is vital. Boise State and other wannabees simply have not earned a shot at LSU or Alabama or other BCS teams. This is not a game of monopoly. It is big time college football, which has millions of devoted fans who donate money and attend or follow games religiously and players who have staked their athletic gifts and struggles on going with a big time program to gain entrance to the pros.
Boise players chose not to take the chance to go to a big time program and risk never playing. Boise State ain't devoted. They could be if they recruited better. They could be if they refused to play crummy teams. I am sick of flashes in the pan rather than a team like Stanford grinding its way to prominence, assuming the PAC 12 is a grind. Still, the PAC 12 is a gauntlet compared to Boise's conference. Think Boise can go undefeated in the PAC 12? No way. And Boise knows it.
I could go on, but I will stop boring people on this point.
Playoffs reduce the regular season, which actually is the most important part of college football. Regular season games must be limited due to the risk of injury during playoffs. But the struggling, cheap, and chump conferences don’t want to agree to increased scholarships so that LSU would be two deep at the critical positions. LSU would have at least two big, fast option quarterbacks of equal ability every year.
Nuff for now.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News