Started By
Message

re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?

Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:43 am to
Posted by sfury
Member since Oct 2011
285 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 3:43 am to
I think Mizzou understands that there is a lot of work to be done and thus the reason for the raise in Athletic budgets and raising of money to add on stands and increase the stadium capacity.

As for recruiting as I basically said that is an unknown. I think being part of the SEC may help to keep some of the recruits we lose from the state to the Big Ten home. Gary Pinkel did a good job getting MU into Texas as far as recruiting and I'm sure he will try to add some games in Texas with other Texas schools. We shall see what happens but if he can adjust to the recruiting changes I believe they will be alright.

I'm more worried about the lack of any kind of power running game over the years which has on occasion created problems on short yardage downs against good defenses. Basically I know Missouri has a lot to learn and a lot of catching up to do and we shall see how it goes.
Posted by Amp4LSU
West Monroe
Member since Sep 2006
334 posts
Posted on 11/8/11 at 9:43 am to
Sunhog, seriously...dude.

Arkansas' facilities/budget SHOULD be larger that Missouri's. Arky has been in the SEC for what, 20 years. If your facilities/budget wasn't better than Mizzou's, there would be something wrong with you guys.



first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram