re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?

quote:

---

Yes, outside of the stadium does nothing for 'upgrades' in recruiting battles of the SEC.

Y'all and TAMU have a lot of work todo to make your stadium on par with normal SEC venues.

You've yet to answer my question about how the SEC is going to give Missouri any type of recruiting advantage compared to the Big12?

---

Come on SunHog, you act like Arkansas is dominating the world of College Football. You guys spend all that Wal-Mart money on your facilities but still got beat by lil Ol Mizzou in football. Hell Ole Miss, TAMU, Arkansas, and South Carolina all have better football stadiums than Mizzou but guess what, Mizzou still beat those teams. So that ARMS RACE talk don't fly.

Mizzou will get recruits. Hell the Chiefs love SEC players and everybody knows that, guess what now Mizzou can use that to it's advantage with 2 pro markets in it's backyard. The best players want to play in the SEC but also want an easier chance at going pro. Jackpot for Mizzou.

And believe me the people of Missouri will not let it's flagship university sag behind, they are planning on upgrading the stadium. By joining the SEC you better believe the people of the Show Me State will step up. Hell the school just spent over $75 mil on a basketball facility, a top notch one. Now it's time for the football upgrades. Hell if Mizzou is doing this good with the facilities they have you better hope they don't do any upgrades because it won't be in Arkansas' best interest considering you already have a hard enough time beating Mizzou even though you have superior facilities.lol.

Talk about BCS bowls, um you guys lost to Ohio State while the other SEC schools that played Ohio State won, good job reppin the SEC with your top notch facilities. Oh and you guys HAVE to upgrade your facilities to get recruits to play in NW ARKANSAS, not a good destination for black recruits if you know what I mean.