- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:16 am to kilo
Posted on 11/8/11 at 2:16 am to kilo
quote:
If you think for one second our athletic budget is only going to increase in proportion to the increased TV revenue difference between the Big 12 and the SEC you are grossly mistaken.
You just assume that Mizzou will maintain the same budget.
Your logic is and has been flawed throughout the discourse here.
Oh, I'm sorry i didn't realize y'all expect to obtain LSU's budget while competing against Pro sports that dominates the state of Missouri unlike LSU.
You have little to no sky boxes or premium club seating. Yet, you expect a vast budget increase? From who? Do tell...
I expect donations to increase and tickets prices to slightly increase at Missouri with a more dominate and exciting schedule. However, there is still over a $12M Net difference between Arkansas and Mizzou. Mizzou will need all the advantages it can get being far north and is a not densely populated recruiting state as their roster shows.
Arkansas' tickets prices increased last year and generated $6.8M that is not reflected on the chart I listed you. We are building new skyboxes and more club seating to generate even more money.
This is an arms race and Missouri needs to understand what they are getting into.
This post was edited on 11/8/11 at 2:37 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News