- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:07 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 5:22 am
21
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:08 pm to DelU249
Nope. Both teams with no losses and thus, equal chances of going to the BCS. Best team will win.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:10 pm to DelU249
If this LSU team plays their game the way we have been playing we will win. If we screw around and get penalties and turn the ball over we will lose. IMO The bad officiating that took place in previous games would not have been a big deal if LSU would have played up too their full potential ALL game.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:10 pm to DelU249
Let me say this. Historically, I have dismissed officiating consipiracies as nonsense.
However, no one has ever given me a legitimate, principled explanation of how the replay officials in 2009 could have missed that PP interception. It's CLEARLY an interception. The replay officials had the luxury of reviewing it ad naseum in SLOW MOTION. How do you miss it? It's one thing to make an error on a close play in real time. That's understandable. It's quite another to make an erroneous call when you have the opportunity to review reolay after replay.
Someone give me a principled, rational explanation for the replay officials' conduct that doesn't involve bias or inexcusably gross incompetence.
However, no one has ever given me a legitimate, principled explanation of how the replay officials in 2009 could have missed that PP interception. It's CLEARLY an interception. The replay officials had the luxury of reviewing it ad naseum in SLOW MOTION. How do you miss it? It's one thing to make an error on a close play in real time. That's understandable. It's quite another to make an erroneous call when you have the opportunity to review reolay after replay.
Someone give me a principled, rational explanation for the replay officials' conduct that doesn't involve bias or inexcusably gross incompetence.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:13 pm to DelU249
I don't think it will be close enough for the refs to decide.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:13 pm to DelU249
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:13 pm to The312
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 2:11 am
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:13 pm to RBWilliams8
quote:
I don't think it will be close enough for the refs to decide.
Didn't you watch the 06 Auburn game?
Posted on 10/24/11 at 1:14 pm to chowell21
quote:
The bad officiating that took place in previous games would not have been a big deal if LSU would have played up to their full potential ALL game.
I'm not as worried about the obvious penalties (false start, delay of game, facemask, etc.) as I am about the ones that are judgement calls or "not always seen" (taunting, holding, etc.). The obvious ones can be avoided by just making sure to play right and pay attention. The others....we'll just have to hope that the refs make good decisions.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:16 pm to The312
quote:
Let me say this. Historically, I have dismissed officiating consipiracies as nonsense.
However, no one has ever given me a legitimate, principled explanation of how the replay officials in 2009 could have missed that PP interception. It's CLEARLY an interception. The replay officials had the luxury of reviewing it ad naseum in SLOW MOTION. How do you miss it? It's one thing to make an error on a close play in real time. That's understandable. It's quite another to make an erroneous call when you have the opportunity to review reolay after replay.
Someone give me a principled, rational explanation for the replay officials' conduct that doesn't involve bias or inexcusably gross incompetence.
Didn't they say something about not having HD monitors in the booth at Alabama? Seems like I remember hearing something like that the week after the game...all of the video equipment was SD, no HD feeds at that time. I don't know for sure though.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:25 pm to DelU249
les has learned how crooked the sec officiating is. he (and lsu) will not let the game be close.
au gained 20 yards just by the sec spots that they were given last week.
al will be given 30 yards, 3 interference calls, and lsu will still win by 30.
this is a game of lsu/les vs the sec/slive.
au gained 20 yards just by the sec spots that they were given last week.
al will be given 30 yards, 3 interference calls, and lsu will still win by 30.
this is a game of lsu/les vs the sec/slive.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:29 pm to The312
quote:
However, no one has ever given me a legitimate, principled explanation of how the replay officials in 2009 could have missed that PP interception.
You act like there's never been a bad call in an SEC game before.
It happens in almost every game, every season. LSU's chances of being screwed are no higher than anyone else's.
This post was edited on 10/24/11 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:35 pm to attheua
quote:
It happens in almost every game, every season. LSU's chances of being screwed are no higher than anyone else's.
I don't agree. There are too many Alabama and Auburn homeboy calls, one as recently as Saturday night during your game with TN.
The Peterson interception was so blatantly a bad call. BAMA and their crimson jockstrap wearing officials need a good arse kicking.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:39 pm to attheua
quote:
It happens in almost every game, every season. LSU's chances of being screwed are no higher than anyone else's.
Unless the opponent is the gumps. Then there are multiple blown calls and conveniently always in favor of the gumps. They are the Patriots after 9/11... And the Celtics of the 80s.
Well see in a couple weeks if the gumps actually have to play the game or not.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:39 pm to DelU249
For some reason I'm worried the ref that flagged Wing is gonna call a BS penalty. He's always yelling at our players after big plays.
One of Jeff's pics.
One of Jeff's pics.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:42 pm to Red Stick Tigress
quote:
The Peterson interception was so blatantly a bad call.
No one disputes the fact that it was a bad call. It was almost as bad as the screwjob the refs gave us in 2004 at Tiger Stadium.
quote:
BAMA and their crimson jockstrap wearing officials need a good arse kicking.
This is the reason LSU fans have the reputation they do. Just curious, when Arkansas beats you, you obviously can't blame it on Bama favoritism. So what's the typical excuse for that game?
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:44 pm to Geaux Tahel
quote:
Well see in a couple weeks if the gumps actually have to play the game or not.
Does it not take all the enjoyment out of the game when you approach every play with a built-in excuse? It seems like watching the games wouldn't be any fun imho.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:46 pm to The312
quote:
Let me say this. Historically, I have dismissed officiating consipiracies as nonsense.
However, no one has ever given me a legitimate, principled explanation of how the replay officials in 2009 could have missed that PP interception. It's CLEARLY an interception. The replay officials had the luxury of reviewing it ad naseum in SLOW MOTION. How do you miss it? It's one thing to make an error on a close play in real time. That's understandable. It's quite another to make an erroneous call when you have the opportunity to review reolay after replay.
Someone give me a principled, rational explanation for the replay officials' conduct that doesn't involve bias or inexcusably gross incompetence.
The SEC refs got away with the "no-call" after the replay on PP7's interception because they called it an incomplete pass. If you noticed the refs huddled after that play to "discuss" before going to the replay. Oh by the way I was at the '06 AUBURN game and, YES, I believe that SEC refs are NOT on the "up and up"!
Buz
Posted on 10/24/11 at 10:50 pm to BuzBomb
The no "holding" calls on Bama do worry me. They get away with it, because its never called on them.
Posted on 10/24/11 at 11:00 pm to attheua
quote:
Does it not take all the enjoyment out of the game when you approach every play with a built-in excuse? It seems like watching the games wouldn't be any fun imho.
It does take enjoyment out of the game knowing the only way the gumps will beat lsu is if the refs carry them... And they usually do. Fortunately lsu only plays the inbreds once a year. So I can get to enjoy the rest of the games... You know... The ones where the refs play fair.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News