- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cam Newton eligibility issue
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:01 pm
For the people who are upset that Cam remained eligible, what other option did they have considering the potential for abuse if they ruled that he was ineligible at AU due to what happened at MSU?
What would stop the school that misses out on a top ranked recruit to their rival from saying that the recruit asked for money?
Take Auburn and Alabama for instance. those two schools go head to head for a lot of the same players. If Cam was ineligible at AU because of something that happened at MSU, what would stop Auburn from coming forward the day after signing day and saying that all of the recruits that AU wanted but Alabama signed had asked for money from AU while on a visit?
The Alabama coaches would say that they were not approached but because AU said they were dirty, then should the kid automatically be ineligible?
What would stop the school that misses out on a top ranked recruit to their rival from saying that the recruit asked for money?
Take Auburn and Alabama for instance. those two schools go head to head for a lot of the same players. If Cam was ineligible at AU because of something that happened at MSU, what would stop Auburn from coming forward the day after signing day and saying that all of the recruits that AU wanted but Alabama signed had asked for money from AU while on a visit?
The Alabama coaches would say that they were not approached but because AU said they were dirty, then should the kid automatically be ineligible?
6
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:02 pm to AUoutlaw420
Its over.
Its dead.
Let it die peacefully.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:04 pm to AUoutlaw420
Wow everyone should just let this go
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:04 pm to AUoutlaw420
I think most people assumed he'd be ruled ineligible for Auburn offering a similar amount of money, not for MSU offering it.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:05 pm to AUoutlaw420
seriously, let it go
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:05 pm to ThaKaptin
Its just for discussion. Im curious how others think the rule should have been interpreted.
What would stop Auburn (or any school) telling all the recruits that they want to either sign with Auburn or we will say you asked for money?
What would stop Auburn (or any school) telling all the recruits that they want to either sign with Auburn or we will say you asked for money?
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:05 pm to AUoutlaw420
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:07 pm to AUoutlaw420
:beatdeadhorse: :beatdeadhorse: :beatdeadhorse:
Posted on 10/14/11 at 4:42 pm to AUoutlaw420
quote:
What would stop Auburn (or any school) telling all the recruits that they want to either sign with Auburn or we will say you asked for money?
Because its not true!
Miss. State didn't lie, his father asked for money.
I'm not saying Auburn did anything wrong, saying Newton's father did.
Posted on 10/14/11 at 5:17 pm to LSUPHILLY72
This post was edited on 10/14/11 at 5:18 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News