- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
Lose Auburn, Keep Florida, Gain TAMU & Mizzou
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:00 am
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:00 am
Sorry, just seeing the Mizzou news. Suppose Auburn-Alabama become permanent East-West opponents, and of course we would play Mizzou & TAMU, and I hope we retain Florida as our every-year-in-the-East opponent.
Guess the St Louis and Kansas City market is enough to tear down a great LSU-Auburn rivalry. Over the last 15 years, it has without question been LSU's most interesting and eventful rivalry, so I am not pleased with that, but thems the breaks I suppose.
Mizzou is very blah to me as an addition, and I am not excited to have another team playing Tiger-related songs and having 3 Tiger mascots in the SEC, but at least now Florida and Tenn will have to play Auburn each year...
But, does this mean Tenn and Bama no longer play? If so, Bama is the winner in this whole thing from a schedule toughness perspective dropping Tenn as their Easr opponent, and giving them an easier haul with the add of TAMU and Mizzou, retention of Auburn and loss of Tenn...
Not enamored with this option at all (if I am in the hunt on this off-the-cuff assessment), as I strongly prefered adding Clemson, VaTech or WVU instead of Mizzou.
Guess the St Louis and Kansas City market is enough to tear down a great LSU-Auburn rivalry. Over the last 15 years, it has without question been LSU's most interesting and eventful rivalry, so I am not pleased with that, but thems the breaks I suppose.
Mizzou is very blah to me as an addition, and I am not excited to have another team playing Tiger-related songs and having 3 Tiger mascots in the SEC, but at least now Florida and Tenn will have to play Auburn each year...
But, does this mean Tenn and Bama no longer play? If so, Bama is the winner in this whole thing from a schedule toughness perspective dropping Tenn as their Easr opponent, and giving them an easier haul with the add of TAMU and Mizzou, retention of Auburn and loss of Tenn...
Not enamored with this option at all (if I am in the hunt on this off-the-cuff assessment), as I strongly prefered adding Clemson, VaTech or WVU instead of Mizzou.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 1:02 am to therocketscientist
I don't think Missouri is coming. The Big 12 might stay together.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 5:53 am to therocketscientist
Missouri doesn't deserve to be in the SEC.
Posted on 9/21/11 at 6:01 am to therocketscientist
I don't see what Missouri brings to the table. Besides the sec doesn't need more tigers,but as we all know LSU will always be the real tigers ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 9/21/11 at 7:05 am to therocketscientist
seems to me we would have to lose alabama also to even the east and the west
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)