re: Grand jury to hear LSU football players case Wednesday; DNA inconclusive

quote:

---

No DNA match means the test was negative, not inconclusive. Did the prosecutor write the headline?

---

Not saying JJ is guilty. Only the real witnesses know what he did and didn't do. BUT how many days after this incident did they wait to get the 49 pairs of shoes? At least a few if memory serves. Ample time to get rid of any that might incriminate him.

Regardless of his guilt or innocence, I'm happy with Lee as our QB. The "knowns" with Lee are better to build on than the "unknowns" from game to game with JJ. He can really hurt us. He was terrible last year against West Virginia. That was one of the most frustrating games I've ever been to. That game, if I'm remembering correctly, was where the boo birds came out. It was ugly and inappropriate as a player has no idea if a fan is booing the player or the coaches but thinking about his play last year brings back bad, bad memories of an offense that couldn't get anything going. We are better off with Lee and if he falters then we're better to move on to Mett.