- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Would it be better to have four 18 team conferences instead of 16?
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:46 am
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:46 am
It'd get pretty much all the decent teams in. You could play an 8 game divison schedule plus a rivalry inter conference game and a rotating game. And still play 2 out of conference games. Then if you win playoff time
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 10:47 am
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:48 am to 19auburn49
Let's just go to 32 and have a NFL type system
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:49 am to 19auburn49
horrible and cfb is ruined.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:49 am to 19auburn49
That's effectively having 8 conferences of 9 teams.
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 10:51 am
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:51 am to heartbreakTiger
quote::omg::omg:
horrible and cfb is ruined
you must be over 50. i bet you thought the BCS would ruin college football, too
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:52 am to 19auburn49
This whole idea of a 4 16 team superconferences is just a pipe dream I think. There is a good chance the PAC can get to 16. There is a decent chance the SEC could get to 16 (but I think they'll stop at 14). There is about no chance that the Big10 will move to 16 IMO, and then you'd need the BigEast and ACC to figure something out and merge, which there isn't a chance in hell of that happening any time soon.
So while this notion of 4 16 team (or 18 or whatever) superconferences is fun to speculate about, there isn't a chance in hell it happens any time soon if ever.
So while this notion of 4 16 team (or 18 or whatever) superconferences is fun to speculate about, there isn't a chance in hell it happens any time soon if ever.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:53 am to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
no actually 24 and i like the bcs. I just dont want a nfl version 2 in cfb. Id rather a no loss or 1 loss champ vs the chance of some 4 loss team winning a nc.
also super conferences will basically kill all good ooc games. I like some variety in teams we play. Super conferences are going to kill that.
plus cfb aint broke so no reason to fix it.
also super conferences will basically kill all good ooc games. I like some variety in teams we play. Super conferences are going to kill that.
plus cfb aint broke so no reason to fix it.
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:55 am to 19auburn49
Actually 20 would be better. That would give each division 5 teams. 
Popular
Back to top
6








