- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Should we go ahead and welcome the Mizzou Tigers as No. 14?
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:22 pm
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:22 pm
. . .cause that is what it's looking like.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:24 pm to RunningBlake
It would be laughable
Why dilute the league more than you already have with TAMU?
Why dilute the league more than you already have with TAMU?
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:25 pm to RunningBlake
That does seem to be the way we are going, I like NC state better though.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:26 pm to RunningBlake
fine with me, Mizzou is a solid university
who moves east? Aubie? hate that
who moves east? Aubie? hate that
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:31 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
who moves east? Aubie? hate that
Yeah, only one that makes sense. much as I hate little frickers, I like having them around to pick on.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:31 pm to stapuffmarshy
I can understand adding TAMU but, on the other hand, I really like 12.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:33 pm to RunningBlake
who says Mizzou is coming?
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:37 pm to 1999
Had Mizzou said anything official???
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:45 pm to RunningBlake
I like 12 too but I had already accepted growth in the future
I love a&m from a LSU perspective, rival that we really hate as much as we can hate a non conf rival
I like Mizzou actually. IMO it's a more natural rival for you, Arky- the basketball series is a true hatred so I can see it them working that way.
And now your adding two states that you have no footprint in. We can all see 2 more in 2 states that the SEC is not in yet.
IMO, the SEC isn't going to make a mistake this time....unless you think they made a mistake the first time...I flame arky all the time but I don't even think that so I think whoever, if anyone
they add it will be well thought out and in the end the right choice
I love a&m from a LSU perspective, rival that we really hate as much as we can hate a non conf rival
I like Mizzou actually. IMO it's a more natural rival for you, Arky- the basketball series is a true hatred so I can see it them working that way.
And now your adding two states that you have no footprint in. We can all see 2 more in 2 states that the SEC is not in yet.
IMO, the SEC isn't going to make a mistake this time....unless you think they made a mistake the first time...I flame arky all the time but I don't even think that so I think whoever, if anyone
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:49 pm to 1999
quote:
who says Mizzou is coming?
No one, but from all reports that seems to be who we are officially courting.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 6:54 pm to NATidefan
quote:
It would be laughable
Why dilute the league more than you already have with TAMU?
Hey you are right! Maybe the SEC should add OSU!!
Posted on 9/2/11 at 7:37 pm to RunningBlake
That we be such a waste. We can do much better than Mizzou. Actually, I wont believe it till the ink is dry.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 7:39 pm to NastyTiger
quote:
That we be such a waste. We can do much better than Mizzou. Actually, I wont believe it till the ink is dry.
Hell you should want Mizzou over FSU or Va Tech. Unless you want a tougher schedule which equals more losses.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 7:53 pm to bayou2003
#14 is looking more and more like it might be virginia tech
Posted on 9/2/11 at 7:56 pm to Rickie
quote:
Why dilute the league more than you already have with TAMU?
Why not?
SEC is easily the toughest conference as it is, why not add money without adding any real difficulty?
Its not like mizzou = duke or anything embarrassing.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 7:56 pm to Covingtiger
quote:
#14 is looking more and more like it might be virginia tech
no, its really not. but whatever folks
Posted on 9/2/11 at 8:08 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
who moves east? Aubie? hate that
As an LSU fan, that would suck. Replacing Auburn on the schedule with Missouri blows. There's too much history in the LSU-Auburn game over the past 25 years to just kick the rivalry to the curb.
The other schools probably wouldn't be too happy about it either. Tennessee would lose their permanent rivalry with Alabama, because the Iron Bowl isn't going anywhere.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 8:13 pm to medtiger
quote:
As an LSU fan, that would suck.
Actually, it would be awesome.
replace AU with Mizzou on the permanent schedule = much easier W every year.
replace UF as permanent east opponent with rotation = easier schedule as well.
this is a win all around for us.
Posted on 9/2/11 at 8:21 pm to medtiger
quote:
As an LSU fan, that would suck. Replacing Auburn on the schedule with Missouri blows. There's too much history in the LSU-Auburn game over the past 25 years to just kick the rivalry to the curb.
The other schools probably wouldn't be too happy about it either. Tennessee would lose their permanent rivalry with Alabama, because the Iron Bowl isn't going anywhere.
Spot on. I like having A&M because they will be a huge rival to LSU in all sports. The 14th has to come from the east.
Popular
Back to top

6







