Started By
Message
locked post

please quit suggesting Tulane-ish schools

Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:14 pm
Posted by gotygers
west St.Tammany
Member since Sep 2007
3016 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:14 pm
Like:

louiville
tcu
east carolina

I know currently they are not as bad as tulane, but at times they have been. They are not long term big time schools. They have periods of success against weak opposition!
Posted by athletemed
The Woodlands, Texas
Member since Oct 2007
5871 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:16 pm to
the school that the SEC wants in the East is Va tech....it would bring in the DC TV market
Posted by gotygers
west St.Tammany
Member since Sep 2007
3016 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:18 pm to
I like VT they fit right in the SEC. Decent program.
Posted by athletemed
The Woodlands, Texas
Member since Oct 2007
5871 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:20 pm to
Adding Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and DC would make the SEC an economic machine...

This post was edited on 8/17/11 at 11:24 pm
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:52 pm to
I do find it amusing that some of the people who trash Tulane constantly are suggesting Baylor and Rice
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 8/17/11 at 11:57 pm to
Basketball-wise Louisville would be huge for the SEC, they could play UK twice a year too...

ETA: their FB program is far from Tulane-ish. 3 bowl wins in last 5 years, including Orange Bowl, also they won the Fiesta vs Miami in the 90s.
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 12:02 am
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:06 am to
quote:

louisville

The SEC Plays more than football.
Posted by Big Kat
Member since Feb 2009
5913 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:11 am to
Tulane went undefeated in the 90's. 98 I think.
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:16 am to
quote:

Tulane went undefeated in the 90's. 98 I think.

Look at them now.







Final AP Poll from 1998.
1 Tennessee (70) 13-0 1,750 1
2 Ohio St. 11-1 1,673 3
3 Florida St. 11-2 1,574 2
4 Arizona 12-1 1,535 5
5 Florida 10-1 1,463 7
6 Wisconsin 11-1 1,427 9
7 Tulane 12-0 1,252 10
8 UCLA 10-2 1,123 6
9 Georgia Tech 10-2 1,122 12
10 Kansas State 11-2 1,086 4
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:16 am to
Yes 1998, Tommy Bowden left after that, they hired Chris Scelfo instead of OC Rick Rodriguez, return to suckage immediately begins.
Posted by Esarhaddon
Lafayette, LA
Member since Aug 2006
19035 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:17 am to
Arkansas vs Louisville had some really good bball games in the 80s i think, along with UNLV, UNC, and Duke they were the powerhouses.
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 12:19 am
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:19 am to
Posted by LSU Tigerhead
Metairie
Member since Nov 2007
5160 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:44 am to
quote:

Yes 1998, Tommy Bowden left after that, they hired Chris Scelfo instead of OC Rick Rodriguez
Tulane sure is a school of smart people.
Posted by TigerSpy
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
9962 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:48 am to
quote:

it would bring in the DC TV market

bullshite
Posted by drexyl
Mingovia
Member since Sep 2005
23334 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:55 am to
quote:

louiville
tcu
east carolina
except for east carolina these are good options; if we do get A&M i'm not convinced we get a "homerun" for the 14th team. i think #14 will be a school like louisville or tcu.

va tech is winning the shite outta the acc right now; why in the hell would they leave?
Posted by TigersOfGeauxld
Just across the water...
Member since Aug 2009
25057 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 7:33 am to
quote:

va tech is winning the shite outta the acc right now; why in the hell would they leave?


Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
11025 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 7:45 am to
quote:

the school that the SEC wants in the East is Va tech....it would bring in the DC TV market


Yes and no. Maryland is in suburban DC and gets most of the local coverage in the DC media and there's Georgetown and the Ivies and east coast coast schools where there's not a lot of interest in college football and the fact that many people to DC are from other parts of the country and then there's UVA and Penn State.

DC is a pro sports town and for college sports hoops gets a lot of attention. Yes you get part of the DC market with VaTech but it's still 90 miles away
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20484 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:20 am to
quote:

I do find it amusing that some of the people who trash Tulane constantly are suggesting Baylor and Rice


I keep reading complaints on this board about how difficult the conference will be if A&M, OU, FSU, etc. will be added, how we'll end up with Texas and some ACC/Big East school in the BCSNCG every year while a 1-loss or 2-loss SEC team gets overlooked even though it played against better competition.

Also we've heard about how Baylor is running scared that a Big 12 collapse may leave it in the land of C-USA or MWC, or worse Sun Belt or even the Southland Conference. I know Vandy is a charter member, but like Baylor it's the only private school in the SEC -- does it secretly harbor a fear that the SEC may dump it for a football power that brings in lots more $$$?

My Rice suggestion is only semi-serious -- I know it isn't and won't ever be in contention for an SEC slot -- but given its generally weak athletic department (save baseball) it would alleviate the concerns about an overly-aggressive schedule by giving SEC teams an easy win. And it would alleviate any Vandy fears of being tossed aside, by giving it a fellow private school member.
Posted by LSUbase13
Mt. Pleasant, SC
Member since Mar 2008
15060 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:50 am to
If we add one, we've gotta add two. Which is why I would want Clemson and North Carolina (even though they said that they would not go to the SEC).
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
20484 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:56 am to
quote:

If we add one, we've gotta add two


How about three? This gets you to 15 schools, which you can then arrange into three five-team divisions.

You would then play every team in your division, one designated rival from each of the other two divisions, and one other team from each of the other two divisions in a rotation. You would thus play every SEC school over a four-year period (though not home and away, but in eight years you would). You would have three games left for OOC opponents.

The three division winners and the second-place team with the best record (head-to-head if a tie, otherwise highest poll ranking) would go to a four-team playoff.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram