Started By
Message

re: Wednesday Mark Ingram

Posted on 8/11/11 at 8:19 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424823 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 8:19 am to
quote:

The only thing I would tell SFP is that he will help the team, as a whole. Not just by rushing for 1K yards. Think play action, keeping the D off the field late in the game...stuff like that. Its not just the rushing yards.

i don't disagree, but there are a bunch of RBs who could theoretically help out in the same areas who would cost less

there are 2 concepts: the player and his value/cost

i really like the player. i hope he lives up to the cost of acquiring the player
Posted by jdrumdog
baton rouge, la
Member since Jan 2010
7655 posts
Posted on 8/11/11 at 8:26 am to
quote:

there are 2 concepts: the player and his value/cost

i really like the player. i hope he lives up to the cost of acquiring the player


I think at this point most experts agree we stole Ingram. It was a great value pick, according to them. Besides, say we don't pick Ingram at all. You can't tell me someone didn't have ears on the other teams, seeing if another team was going to pick up Ingram if we passed.

There is a 3rd concept.....our head coach has a wish list of players that he'd like to have based on the team's evaluations.

combine those three and everyone determined that the player and his value/cost was worth it. So far, this FO has proven time and again to mostly get maximum value for the money invested.

So to say that there are a bunch of RBs who could help out in the same areas is pure malarkey, as there are no Heisman trophy winners who cost less in this past years draft.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram