- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Random Money/Business/Finance Thoughts Thread
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:37 pm to Doc Fenton
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:37 pm to Doc Fenton
quote:Actually, my point is that IRR is still in fact the most useful result. Instead having to assume a discount rate to test at various points for positive NPV, you now know that NPV is positive if discount rate or cost or capital is at least 6%. People like to throw IRR under the bus, but even in the example above it is superior to NPV if interpreted rigorously.
Got it now. The higher the benchmark rate you put into your formula, the more your NPV increased, showing that NPV is the more exact fundamental formula, although people usually prefer the ease of using IRR in practice.
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:42 pm to Bayou Tiger
quote:
People like to throw IRR under the bus, but even in the example above it is superior to NPV if interpreted rigorously.
Hmmmm, that's not the way I interpret it...
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:45 pm to Bayou Tiger
Well, for whatever its worth, we usually had to plot npv/irr on charts, so that's pretty common now. I'm not sure I follow your irr v npv superiority argument, so I'm not arguing against you.
Posted on 5/23/11 at 10:03 pm to Bayou Tiger
Interesting. Haven't sen you around here before, which is surprising after that knowledge drop.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)