Started By
Message

re: Random Money/Business/Finance Thoughts Thread

Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:37 pm to
Posted by Bayou Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
3660 posts
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Got it now. The higher the benchmark rate you put into your formula, the more your NPV increased, showing that NPV is the more exact fundamental formula, although people usually prefer the ease of using IRR in practice.
Actually, my point is that IRR is still in fact the most useful result. Instead having to assume a discount rate to test at various points for positive NPV, you now know that NPV is positive if discount rate or cost or capital is at least 6%. People like to throw IRR under the bus, but even in the example above it is superior to NPV if interpreted rigorously.
Posted by Doc Fenton
New York, NY
Member since Feb 2007
52698 posts
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

People like to throw IRR under the bus, but even in the example above it is superior to NPV if interpreted rigorously.


Hmmmm, that's not the way I interpret it...
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 5/23/11 at 6:45 pm to
Well, for whatever its worth, we usually had to plot npv/irr on charts, so that's pretty common now. I'm not sure I follow your irr v npv superiority argument, so I'm not arguing against you.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 5/23/11 at 10:03 pm to
Interesting. Haven't sen you around here before, which is surprising after that knowledge drop.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram