- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Standard & Poor’s Puts ‘Negative’ Outlook on U.S. Rating
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:31 pm
I can't believe no one is discussing this one. Bloomberg seems to think that the pols are going to get their act together and do something meaningful about the enormous deficits. Another laugher from Bloomberg:
"April 18 (Bloomberg) -- Standard & Poor’s put the U.S. government on notice that it risks losing its AAA credit rating unless policy makers agree on a plan by 2013 to reduce budget deficits and the national debt.
“If an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation does not begin by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer ‘AAA’ sovereigns,” New York-based S&P said today in a report that maintained its top rating on U.S. long-term debt while lowering the outlook to “negative” for the first time.
S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its “baseline assumption” is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits. Treasuries and the dollar rebounded from early losses following the statement, while stocks declined. Moody’s Investor Service, which has a stable outlook on U.S. debt, today said the U.S. budget debate is “positive” for the country’s credit."
more blather: LINK
"April 18 (Bloomberg) -- Standard & Poor’s put the U.S. government on notice that it risks losing its AAA credit rating unless policy makers agree on a plan by 2013 to reduce budget deficits and the national debt.
“If an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation does not begin by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer ‘AAA’ sovereigns,” New York-based S&P said today in a report that maintained its top rating on U.S. long-term debt while lowering the outlook to “negative” for the first time.
S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its “baseline assumption” is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits. Treasuries and the dollar rebounded from early losses following the statement, while stocks declined. Moody’s Investor Service, which has a stable outlook on U.S. debt, today said the U.S. budget debate is “positive” for the country’s credit."
more blather: LINK
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:33 pm to RasinCane
Washington will not like this
A corporation taking the government by the balls?
A corporation taking the government by the balls?
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:35 pm to RasinCane
How in the hell can S&P's outlook be negative enough to consider cutting the US treasury rating, and yet Moody's can have a positive outlook at the same time?
I'm pretty sure that after seeing how big of a fail these rating agencies were circa 2008 in terms of properly evaluating debt risk, I think they are just full of shite.
What does this even mean?.....
I'm pretty sure that after seeing how big of a fail these rating agencies were circa 2008 in terms of properly evaluating debt risk, I think they are just full of shite.
What does this even mean?.....
quote:
S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its “baseline assumption” is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits.
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:38 pm to lynxcat
This just might be the imputus the gov needs to finally go after the ratings agencies, or just S&P, for selling their ratings during the housing bubble.
Then again maybe the gov had them do it so the pols have cover to cut some of the social fat?
Then again maybe the gov had them do it so the pols have cover to cut some of the social fat?
Posted on 4/18/11 at 6:33 pm to LSUtoOmaha
quote:The "one in three chance" phrase is the definition of "negative" outlook for a credit rating. Standard language.
What does this even mean?.....
quote:
S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years
Posted on 4/18/11 at 7:18 pm to LSURussian
I'm relived that you believe a negative S%P outlook is good news you're spinning away like a washer and going nowhere like a washer nothing beats a try but a flop lol
Here is a list of 25 spin techniques in case you missed it:LINK
Here is a list of 25 spin techniques in case you missed it:LINK
Posted on 4/18/11 at 7:24 pm to RasinCane
quote:You're being relived as RC after being Rivers?
I'm relived
quote:Is that what your reading comprehension skills tell you about my comment? Seriously?
that you believe a negative S%P outlook is good news
Popular
Back to top
2





