Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Standard & Poor’s Puts ‘Negative’ Outlook on U.S. Rating

Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:31 pm
Posted by RasinCane
Member since Mar 2011
147 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:31 pm
I can't believe no one is discussing this one. Bloomberg seems to think that the pols are going to get their act together and do something meaningful about the enormous deficits. Another laugher from Bloomberg:

"April 18 (Bloomberg) -- Standard & Poor’s put the U.S. government on notice that it risks losing its AAA credit rating unless policy makers agree on a plan by 2013 to reduce budget deficits and the national debt.

“If an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation does not begin by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer ‘AAA’ sovereigns,” New York-based S&P said today in a report that maintained its top rating on U.S. long-term debt while lowering the outlook to “negative” for the first time.

S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its “baseline assumption” is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits. Treasuries and the dollar rebounded from early losses following the statement, while stocks declined. Moody’s Investor Service, which has a stable outlook on U.S. debt, today said the U.S. budget debate is “positive” for the country’s credit."

more blather: LINK
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24995 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:33 pm to
Washington will not like this

A corporation taking the government by the balls?
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26709 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:35 pm to
How in the hell can S&P's outlook be negative enough to consider cutting the US treasury rating, and yet Moody's can have a positive outlook at the same time?

I'm pretty sure that after seeing how big of a fail these rating agencies were circa 2008 in terms of properly evaluating debt risk, I think they are just full of shite.

What does this even mean?.....

quote:

S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years and that its “baseline assumption” is that Congress and the Obama administration will come to terms on a plan to reduce record deficits.
Posted by RasinCane
Member since Mar 2011
147 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 5:38 pm to
This just might be the imputus the gov needs to finally go after the ratings agencies, or just S&P, for selling their ratings during the housing bubble.
Then again maybe the gov had them do it so the pols have cover to cut some of the social fat?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133527 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

What does this even mean?.....

quote:
S&P said there’s a one-in-three chance that the rating might be cut within two years
The "one in three chance" phrase is the definition of "negative" outlook for a credit rating. Standard language.
Posted by RasinCane
Member since Mar 2011
147 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 7:18 pm to
I'm relived that you believe a negative S%P outlook is good news you're spinning away like a washer and going nowhere like a washer nothing beats a try but a flop lol

Here is a list of 25 spin techniques in case you missed it:LINK
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133527 posts
Posted on 4/18/11 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

I'm relived
You're being relived as RC after being Rivers?

quote:

that you believe a negative S%P outlook is good news
Is that what your reading comprehension skills tell you about my comment? Seriously?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram