- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Would Ingram be a good pick if still available for saints?
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:43 pm
I think he might be a good choice, if not who you got depending on availability??
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:46 pm to LSU CWF8
more OT Rant spillover, no ST posts
at least look through the first page here before dumping garabge, this has been discussed ad nauseum
at least look through the first page here before dumping garabge, this has been discussed ad nauseum
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:49 pm to St Augustine
Don't just tell me NO tell me who you think would be the best pick and Y?? Be realistic!!
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:53 pm to LSU CWF8
Jai Eugene because he is from LSU 
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:57 pm to LSU CWF8
I hope Mallett is available, since Brees is a shell of his former self and might bolt
Posted on 4/14/11 at 7:58 pm to LSU CWF8
quote:
Be realistic!!
I wish you'd jump off
THIS
quote:
Don't just tell me NO tell me who you think would be the best pick and Y??
read the other threads K????
This post was edited on 4/14/11 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 4/14/11 at 8:40 pm to LSU CWF8
Yes, I think he would be. A workhorse running back who can keep the other teams offense off the field will help our defense tremendously.
And what is the REAL problem with having another thread on this? How does it affect everyone's lives negatively? If you don't like, simply don't read it. Sheeeesh!!!
And what is the REAL problem with having another thread on this? How does it affect everyone's lives negatively? If you don't like, simply don't read it. Sheeeesh!!!
Posted on 4/14/11 at 8:49 pm to CM84
See? People DO like having another Ingram thread.
Posted on 4/14/11 at 9:23 pm to LSU CWF8
He is certainly a BPA option if available at pick 24 but I'd rather see the best defensive player get picked. It would be great if Loomis could trade back a little and pick him up. That way, we could be in position to still draft a higher tier defensive lineman early in the second round.
Posted on 4/14/11 at 9:25 pm to LSU CWF8
ingram is already the next bush on this board and he isnt even a saint yet
Posted on 4/14/11 at 9:40 pm to BlacknGold
Ingram reminds me of Knowshon Moreno with a little more power but less pass catching ability. Basing my decision off of this, I wouldn't want Ingram until very late in the first or early second.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 8:00 am to coldhotwings
quote:
Yes, I think he would be. A workhorse running back who can keep the other teams offense off the field will help our defense tremendously.
wrong, sort of. Yes we need a workhorse RB, Ingram is not that.
quote:
He is certainly a BPA option if available at pick 24 but I'd rather see the best defensive player get picked. It would be great if Loomis could trade back a little and pick him up.
WRONG
quote:
Don't just tell me NO tell me who you think would be the best pick and Y?? Be realistic!!
Ingram has a bum knee and that's hurting his draft stock BIG time. Probably 2nd rounder at best. If he's available for our 2nd round pick, then I say go for him. But most certainly not the first round, and DEFINITELY don't trade up to get him. Plus we need to grab defense from the 1st round. Ryan Kerrigan or the like.
quote:
And what is the REAL problem with having another thread on this? How does it affect everyone's lives negatively? If you don't like, simply don't read it. Sheeeesh!!!
Because it clogs up the board with shite that's already there. There's already a thread on this, so use that one.
This post was edited on 4/15/11 at 8:02 am
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:05 am to Hulkklogan
we need a defensive player in round 1
/thread
/thread
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:12 am to touchdown moses
Taking Ingram before the 3rd round is a mistake.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 10:02 am to LSU CWF8
quote:
Don't just tell me NO tell me who you think would be the best pick and Y?? Be realistic!!
Y don't U just check the 127 threads on the exact same subject you just started.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 12:26 pm to LSU CWF8
yes.
more often than not, stud college backs, are stud NFL backs...
I never understood why players like jones-drew and portis went second round.
take the best player available. There is no game changing DE that late in the draft, and too much is made out of the defensive performance in seattle. Defense took steps forward this year...i don't know what the fuss is about
more often than not, stud college backs, are stud NFL backs...
I never understood why players like jones-drew and portis went second round.
take the best player available. There is no game changing DE that late in the draft, and too much is made out of the defensive performance in seattle. Defense took steps forward this year...i don't know what the fuss is about
Posted on 4/15/11 at 12:46 pm to DelU249
quote:
yes.
more often than not, stud college backs, are stud NFL backs...
I never understood why players like jones-drew and portis went second round.
take the best player available. There is no game changing DE that late in the draft, and too much is made out of the defensive performance in seattle. Defense took steps forward this year...i don't know what the fuss is about
I'd say MAYBE if he didn't have a bum knee. But the reason this happens is because there is always plenty of serviceable and good RBs in the 3rd round or later.
But Ingram has a bum knee and a lot of teams are not going to take a chance on him with that knee in the first round.
Posted on 4/15/11 at 12:51 pm to touchdown moses
quote:
we need a defensive player in round 1
/thread
Don't know if you have noticed or not, but since Loomis and Payton took over they have gone for the Best Player Available regardless of position and that's worked out well so far.
Popular
Back to top

10








