Started By
Message

re: Shooting Dogs

Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by Bleeding purple
Athens, Texas
Member since Sep 2007
25315 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

. Reasonable people don't shoot pets no matter how irresponsible the owner may be


Emotional irrational people who endear less evolved animals with human cognition and emotion are unable to see that a pet that is uncontrolled and destructive is a pest. It is not my responsibility to fence 1000 acres so a dog cant get it, it is the owners responsibility to control the animal. Refusal to be responsible for the dog and controll it leaves the property owner with two options, 1. accept the abuse of thier rights and proerty, or 2. protect them.


The pussification of America has too many people willing to accept the first option so they dont hurt someones feelings.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167103 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

The pussification of America



MUST END


RIGHT HERE


RIGHT NOW
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263268 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:40 pm to
quote:


The pussification of America has too many people willing to accept the first option so they dont hurt someones feelings.



Wow. You totally do not understand the issue, or have the ability to comprehend it.

If your kid wanders on the neighbors property, does he have the right to punish the kid? No matter what you think about pet dogs, they are are extremely important to some people.

It's not a dog issue, its a human issue and your inability to figure this out. Some of us have higher level cognitive abilities than you. It's about respect.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81952 posts
Posted on 12/21/10 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Emotional irrational people who endear less evolved animals with human cognition and emotion are unable to see that a pet that is uncontrolled and destructive is a pest. It is not my responsibility to fence 1000 acres so a dog cant get it, it is the owners responsibility to control the animal. Refusal to be responsible for the dog and controll it leaves the property owner with two options, 1. accept the abuse of thier rights and proerty, or 2. protect them.


Wow, this is really poor reasoning and writing. No one is doing what you think they are doing. They are just saying that shooting a pet is wrong. Accepting responsibility means what? Others can kill it? You're making no sense.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram