- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mettenberger and Petrino
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:29 am to sugatowng
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:29 am to sugatowng
quote:
We went after Mett for another reason though we would have taken him no doubt
This is one case where trying to **** over your division rival, who has no QB for the foreseeable future, is a brilliant move in strategy. It didn't work out for Arky, and typically I am against that sort of play, but in this case it was a good attempt.
LSU is a probably in the national title game with a legitimate QB--I think pretty much everyone recognizes it was the only missing piece.
2
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:31 am to lynxcat
quote:
This is one case where trying to **** over your division rival, who has no QB for the foreseeable future, is a brilliant move in strategy. It didn't work out for Arky, and typically I am against that sort of play, but in this case it was a good attempt.
That's all it was. That's the only reason why Bama offers a few kids every year.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:31 am to lynxcat
quote:
It didn't work out for Arky, and typically I am against that sort of play, but in this case it was a good attempt.
You make it sound like we've done something dirty?? There are 3 players on that team we are after and Mett wasn't #1 on that list. He might be #3
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News