Started By
Message

re: Mettenberger and Petrino

Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:17 am to
Posted by sugatowng
Look at my bling Bitches
Member since Nov 2006
25333 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:17 am to
Mett would probably be behind Wilson and Mitchell yes...

We went after Mett for another reason though we would have taken him no doubt
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Mett would probably be behind Wilson


Only person he would be behind.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
30922 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:22 am to
he might have been behind wilson.

no way hes behind mitchell too. if you really think that you are pretty delusional. my guess is had he committed to arky you would be ecstatic about the great qb competition that would be to follow.
Posted by lynxcat
Member since Jan 2008
24252 posts
Posted on 12/6/10 at 11:29 am to
quote:

We went after Mett for another reason though we would have taken him no doubt


This is one case where trying to **** over your division rival, who has no QB for the foreseeable future, is a brilliant move in strategy. It didn't work out for Arky, and typically I am against that sort of play, but in this case it was a good attempt.

LSU is a probably in the national title game with a legitimate QB--I think pretty much everyone recognizes it was the only missing piece.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram