quote:
Really? Because in the Auburn games and Arkansas games it looked the the defense had their asses handed to them. LSU scored enough points to beat Arkansas but the defense gave up way, way too many big plays. Look at the big games we won...Florida and Bama...LSU had sustained drives that allowed the defense to rest. What happened? We won. Against Auburn and Arkansas, offense was off the field quickly and defense spent far more than their share of time on the field and got our asses handed to us.

Had LSU scored more than 20 pts LSU wins even w/ the tired defense. And unless Leach's offense is scoring in 3 plays, that wouldn't be an issue. Not to mention the difference b/n 0 and 7 pts

quote:
With Leach's offense, expect our defense to be out there the same amount of time as they were for Auburn and Arkansas. Again, I admit that we would have more points, but I state again..Is winning 45 to 40 really any better than 20 to 14? No. So Leach may not be the upgrade that we really need to go after.

again w/ the retarded jump to the defense giving up 40 ppg. It's my whole issue w/ your terrible logic

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Chicot

Baton Rouge, LA

Member since Aug 2007

1279 posts

Posted on 11/29/10 at 1:43 pm to Books

quote:
again w/ the retarded jump to the defense giving up 40 ppg. It's my whole issue w/ your terrible logic

Okay, I can see your point here that you don't agree that we will necessarily give up 40 ppg. But you still haven't added anything to say why you think Leach is the best possible OC that LSU should be pursuing?

By the way, still waiting: Name one team that runs or ran a spread offense that also had a top 10 defense consistently?

1 ...

Report Post

Coaching Changes - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board