Started By
Message

re: If we were to get Leach

Posted on 11/29/10 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by Chicot
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Aug 2007
1279 posts
Posted on 11/29/10 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

the argument that the reason Leach shouldn't come, because our D would suffer, is invalid.


I agree that it is invalid if we are saying that we should keep Crowton rather than going after Leach...again under both coaches our defense would be on the field the same amount of time.

But again, I am not saying that I want Crowton over Leach. What I am saying is that I want someone that has run a proven balanced attack. An offensive coach that can put of an average of 30 points (instead of Leach's 45 maybe) but that can help keep our defense fresh enough to keep the other team to say 10 points. I just don't see how winning 45 to 40 under Leach as OC would be any better than winning 20 to 14 like we do now.
Posted by Books
BR
Member since Jun 2005
11174 posts
Posted on 11/29/10 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

but that can help keep our defense fresh enough to keep the other team to say 10 points. I just don't see how winning 45 to 40 under Leach as OC would be any better than winning 20 to 14 like we do now.
holy shite, you're slow
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram