Started By
Message

re: if our D only would have attacked Newton like this...

Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:16 pm to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56953 posts
Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

They did adjust very well.

They werent able to run the ball all game.


in the 2nd half they supplemented the running game with short swing passes, short hitches. That put them in 2nd and 3rd and short the whole 2nd half. That fits right into Newton's strength. He is money in short yardage.


I kick myself thinking what we could have done had we sold out to stop the run more. Like I said, our secondary is much better than Bama's. I would have trusted them against Newton through the air. Auburn's 2 biggest plays of the game were seemingly busted coverages anyway. Shame on Bama for not making those plays, it cost them the game.


It's just not as simple as you make it out to be.

Bama's approach was no more affective than LSU's. And you jumped the gun on proclaiming differently.

Take your medicine and admit that you were wrong. It's the best approach at this point.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279537 posts
Posted on 11/26/10 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Bama's approach was no more affective than LSU's.




LSU gave up 440 yards rushing ALONE vs Auburn @ 8.4 YPC

Bama gave up 108 rushing today at 2.6 YPC


Auburn didnt even have that 440 yards in total offense today(324), much less on the ground.


Not as effective? HAHA.

Quit talking out of your arse. Though I am sure you will read this, yet I know you have no response for this already.
This post was edited on 11/26/10 at 8:30 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram