- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Another Auburn chop block
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:31 am
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:31 am
Anyone think like I do and feel Auburn #90's hit on Mallet was excessive? It ocurred on Ark's 1st TD and put Mallet out of the game with a concussion. None of the TV people said anything, but #90 had Mallet down easy enough, then finished the QB off by landing on him full weight.
I don't know what the answer is to this, but it's getting harder and harder on the QBs given the size of the linemen rushing them. Maybe we should go back to the old substitution rules that made it necessary to play both offense and defense. That would lighten everyone up for the sake of endurance. But I don't see any move in that direction.
All I could think about when Mallet was down was that Auburn chop block two years ago on our star defensive lineman.
I don't know what the answer is to this, but it's getting harder and harder on the QBs given the size of the linemen rushing them. Maybe we should go back to the old substitution rules that made it necessary to play both offense and defense. That would lighten everyone up for the sake of endurance. But I don't see any move in that direction.
All I could think about when Mallet was down was that Auburn chop block two years ago on our star defensive lineman.
This post was edited on 10/18/10 at 8:33 am
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:32 am to engl6914
wasn't a chop block but should have been called a horse collar and how much the NCAA protects QBs that was the biggest BS call ever
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:32 am to engl6914
Normal tackle imo. This ain't two-hand touch.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:35 am to engl6914
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:39 am to Rouge
Horse collars are legal in college. But, it looked like after he drug him down, he then landed on Mallet's head with his own helmet. That should have been called.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:40 am to Rouge
quote:
looks like a horse collar to me
I'm not sure if he dragged him down by the collar. BTW, that gave me a concussion watching it. I've never had 300 lbs dropped on my head and can't imagine was Mallett was feeling.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:49 am to graychef
I didn't think it was excessive, but I am very worried about them chop blocking Nevis.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:53 am to Newbomb Turk
quote:No.
Horse collars are legal in college
If you let go on the way down, it isn't a horse collar.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:55 am to TigerFanNKaty
If they chop block Nevis, I hope they have battery shields on their sideline.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:58 am to toosleaux
regardless if you let go or not, that was a horse collar. it had all the conditions met by the rule. It was a one on one tackle, Mallet's motion was changed due to the pulling action.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:59 am to richmondtyger
Horse collars should be legal anyways.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:00 am to Me4Heisman
quote:
Horse collars are legal in college.
Craig Loston told me you are a liar.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:01 am to Me4Heisman
Agreed, they are trying to make football a pussy game.

Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:02 am to engl6914
It's TACKLE football. Mallet is 6'7, 250lbs. The defensive player isn't looking to see if the guy has thrown the ball or not before making the tackle. If you come at a QB half-assed, then there is a good chance he breaks the tackle or at least shrugs it off enough to make a good throw. LSU will have to bring the same type of hit on Newton to bring him down.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:04 am to Rouge
quote:
go to the 4:15 mark
looks like a horse collar to me
let me know if i'm wrong
looks like he let go before he really pulled on it. k. sheppard did a similar thing a couple weeks ago. pretty heads up to let go.
but the hit after mallet was alread down was excessive and should of been called. it wasn't momentum. he adjusted his fall and aimed for mallet's head.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:10 am to toosleaux
It wasn't a horse collar tackle. The QB's momentum was going backwards as did the tackle. Horse collars comes into play when the runner is moving forward and the tackle is made pulling the runner backwards. Horse collar does not apply to a ball carrier who is inside the tackle box.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:14 am to flatfoot
I watched the game plus numerous replays of this hit. It was 100% legal and was not even that violent. Fairley could have legally hit him a lot harder and still been completely clean. In fact, I was very surprised that Mallet was injured by tit.
IMHO - it was a 100% clean hit with no malice intended.
Thats football - lets not sissyfy it more than it already has been.
IMHO - it was a 100% clean hit with no malice intended.
Thats football - lets not sissyfy it more than it already has been.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:16 am to flatfoot
quote:
Horse collar does not apply to a ball carrier who is inside the tackle box.
this
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:16 am to richmondtyger
Here's the rule:
All players are prohibited from grabbing the inside back collar of the shoulder pads or jersey, or the inside collar of the side of the shoulder pads or jersey, and immediately pulling the ball carrier down. This does not apply to a ball carrier, including a potential passer, who is inside the tackle box (Rule 2-34).
Not a horse collar tackle.
All players are prohibited from grabbing the inside back collar of the shoulder pads or jersey, or the inside collar of the side of the shoulder pads or jersey, and immediately pulling the ball carrier down. This does not apply to a ball carrier, including a potential passer, who is inside the tackle box (Rule 2-34).
Not a horse collar tackle.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:22 am to xLxSxUxFxAxNx
quote:
but the hit after mallet was alread down was excessive and should of been called. it wasn't momentum. he adjusted his fall and aimed for mallet's head.
I didn't see it that way at all. Looked like Mallett fell backwards underneath him.
Popular
Back to top
4







