- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kentucky 2002
Posted on 9/9/10 at 12:08 pm to 1984Tiger
Posted on 9/9/10 at 12:08 pm to 1984Tiger
quote:
So in HINDSIGHT, everything turned out fine, right? Up to that point, Saban had gone 8-4, 10-3, 8-4 ... AT THAT TIME, why weren't fans screaming about Saban's poor defense against a mediocre Kentucky team?
Because a lot of people gave Saban a pass for losing Damien James and Matt Mauck mid season (yes, it was his fault Mauck got injured). Don't forget that Toefield was injured for a majority of 2002 as well.
But I remember Saban said after the game he was concerned about letting them back in the 4th quarter, and that this game was an example of why we need to play for a full 60 minutes. Would be nice if Miles had that attitude.
Posted on 9/9/10 at 12:13 pm to Chimlim
quote:
But I remember Saban said after the game he was concerned about letting them back in the 4th quarter, and that this game was an example of why we need to play for a full 60 minutes.
Do you really think that the entire coaching staff doesn't have the same concerns? Just because it isn't explicitly stated in the press, doesn't mean there's no concern.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)