Why wasn't Murphy's fumble reviewed?

I thought the same thing.

It should have been.

UNCs twice got a review for a change in call that would have favored them without having to call a timeout.

I didnt really understand it.

quote:

---

It may not have been reversed but it sure look like his knee had hit the ground before the ball came out.

---

The ball was out before his knee hit the ground. All calls are reviewed. If Les had challenged the call,he would have lost the challenge.The runners need to secure the football better. When you hold the ball out away from your body, you are asking to get it stripped from you. Lack of focus.

yep, plus the ground caused the fumble. it is what it is though.

Murph was down. I couldnt believe it was uncontested. Les needs to hire someone to walk around the sideline with him that possess common sense to advise him.

As was said earlier, every play is reviewed. Some plays just get further review.

Don't be a jerk. It wasn't reviewed like the other fumbles.

I also thought it was a crappy missed fumble call midway through the third quarter. LSU's defense stood NC running back #6 (Elzy?) up at the line and he fumbled and we recovered... but they called it dead (forward progress) even though he was still pumping his legs and struggling to move forward. That would've given LSU the ball with almost in scoring position.