- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bookie says they won't play
Posted on 8/31/10 at 11:59 am to Zach
Posted on 8/31/10 at 11:59 am to Zach
quote:
When you've got that much riding on a FB game you cover your bases with your contacts. Hell, this gambler friend of mine delivered money to a center from LSU in the 60s after he hiked the ball over the punters head as promised.
3
Posted on 8/31/10 at 12:07 pm to LSURulzSEC
Sorry to disillusion you, Rulz, but it happened. And it wasn't point shaving. It was throwing a game.
Posted on 8/31/10 at 12:22 pm to LSURulzSEC
quote:
Thought the same thing.
Lessee.... about a hundred games, times let's say an average of 6 punts per game, means not a whole lot of research required to pull a few names out of the archives.
Posted on 8/31/10 at 1:49 pm to LSURulzSEC
I have no idea if they will play or not, but it makes sense they would not play. If those players under suspicion do play, and UNC wins, and those players are lated suspended, UNC would have the win removed from the books (i guess). From UNC's perspective, it would be better to hold the players out of the game. From my irrelevent perspective, I would want UNC playing with its best people, because if LSU wins, the negitives would question the win. Seems lose - lose scenario.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News