- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Charles Bronson's Inception Review
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:02 pm
What an amazing movie!! I think we all waited long enough this summer to watch something monumental. In thirty years, our kids will be talking about this film as one of the greatest ever.
That's what you expected me to say. That's what you expect everyone to say. But let's be honest here. Christopher Nolan is a one hit wonder. This movie was little more than Memento remade with a few twists.
Of course, the pseudo-intellectuals of this forum are going to have mind orgasms discussing the movie. What's not to love -- college intro level introductions to Kant, Descartes, Freud, Jung, and Kierkegaard. With the level of intelligentsia on this forum, the theme of this movie will be rehashed countless times in more ways than not, each time with a poster trying to prove his intelligence and education. The fact is this movie does not bring anything interesting to the table except a college freshman's virgin take on the principle thoughts of these thinkers, all fit to a third grader's level. Because, let's face it, how can you get cerebrally involved in a two hour movie?
I will introduce elements of the movie that you may not want to read if you don't want to know what happened in the movie. The theme of the movie is What is real? Am I real? Is my reality real? Big questions, questions everyone, even retards, ask. The movie tries to get us to question if our life is real. Just like Memento. Are our memories real? Just like Memento. Can we trust our minds or are our minds playing tricks on us? Just like Memento.
Behind the theme, we also catch a glimpse into the idea of guilt. That guilt is one of the driving forces in life. That some peoples' lives are entirely controlled by guilt. I think Leonardo's character is supposed to represent, poorly I might add, St. Augustine's pre-conversion, yet pre-sanctified, life. The third to last scene is where the movie really begins. With his wife. With his infection of her with the illusion of ideas. From thence comes all manner of infections. Everyone in the movie is infected as a result of the Original Infection. See the parallels to Augustine?
And he cannot shake the Original Infection. It chases him everywhere he goes. It pollutes and corrupts everything he touches as a result. And the more he tries to fix it through his own power, a sense of Pelagian fatalism, the more abstracted, the more broken, the more fatally complex his problem and life become. Everyone else in the movie is a pawn to him, a means to an end. And they suffer greatly as a result.
Juno is hot. I really would like to marry her so I could get in her pants. She's going to be a great Hollywood actress. Probably the top of my generation. Tom Berenger is a bum. He adds nothing to the movie except to appeal to the gun losers who drool over his Big Gun in Snipers. Man crush much? The little guy from Third Rock from the Sun is strong. I thought he was gay, but he seems straight in this movie. The Chinaman really wasn't interesting. The British guy, not Mike Caine, was solid. The Indian drug chemist was a weirdo.
Overall, it was a somewhat interesting movie, but brings little new to the cinema. If anyone called Spike Lee a one trick pony, they need to come clean and confess to Nolan's myopia and college freshman level use of ideas. I am not impressed.
For a number rating, see my thread "Rating of Movies at the Theater Now."
That's what you expected me to say. That's what you expect everyone to say. But let's be honest here. Christopher Nolan is a one hit wonder. This movie was little more than Memento remade with a few twists.
Of course, the pseudo-intellectuals of this forum are going to have mind orgasms discussing the movie. What's not to love -- college intro level introductions to Kant, Descartes, Freud, Jung, and Kierkegaard. With the level of intelligentsia on this forum, the theme of this movie will be rehashed countless times in more ways than not, each time with a poster trying to prove his intelligence and education. The fact is this movie does not bring anything interesting to the table except a college freshman's virgin take on the principle thoughts of these thinkers, all fit to a third grader's level. Because, let's face it, how can you get cerebrally involved in a two hour movie?
I will introduce elements of the movie that you may not want to read if you don't want to know what happened in the movie. The theme of the movie is What is real? Am I real? Is my reality real? Big questions, questions everyone, even retards, ask. The movie tries to get us to question if our life is real. Just like Memento. Are our memories real? Just like Memento. Can we trust our minds or are our minds playing tricks on us? Just like Memento.
Behind the theme, we also catch a glimpse into the idea of guilt. That guilt is one of the driving forces in life. That some peoples' lives are entirely controlled by guilt. I think Leonardo's character is supposed to represent, poorly I might add, St. Augustine's pre-conversion, yet pre-sanctified, life. The third to last scene is where the movie really begins. With his wife. With his infection of her with the illusion of ideas. From thence comes all manner of infections. Everyone in the movie is infected as a result of the Original Infection. See the parallels to Augustine?
And he cannot shake the Original Infection. It chases him everywhere he goes. It pollutes and corrupts everything he touches as a result. And the more he tries to fix it through his own power, a sense of Pelagian fatalism, the more abstracted, the more broken, the more fatally complex his problem and life become. Everyone else in the movie is a pawn to him, a means to an end. And they suffer greatly as a result.
Juno is hot. I really would like to marry her so I could get in her pants. She's going to be a great Hollywood actress. Probably the top of my generation. Tom Berenger is a bum. He adds nothing to the movie except to appeal to the gun losers who drool over his Big Gun in Snipers. Man crush much? The little guy from Third Rock from the Sun is strong. I thought he was gay, but he seems straight in this movie. The Chinaman really wasn't interesting. The British guy, not Mike Caine, was solid. The Indian drug chemist was a weirdo.
Overall, it was a somewhat interesting movie, but brings little new to the cinema. If anyone called Spike Lee a one trick pony, they need to come clean and confess to Nolan's myopia and college freshman level use of ideas. I am not impressed.
For a number rating, see my thread "Rating of Movies at the Theater Now."
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:05 pm to Charles Bronson
Nothing to see here people. Move along
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:08 pm to Charles Bronson
Cliff notes for those not wanting to read that bullshite:
I'm Charles Bronson, and I'm awesome. Everyone said Inception was good, but I'm cool, so I'm not going to conform. It sucked. See how cool that made me? Not cool enough? Okay then, I want to have sex with Ellen Page. Now am I cool? Anyone?
:crickets:
I'm Charles Bronson, and I'm awesome. Everyone said Inception was good, but I'm cool, so I'm not going to conform. It sucked. See how cool that made me? Not cool enough? Okay then, I want to have sex with Ellen Page. Now am I cool? Anyone?
:crickets:
This post was edited on 7/16/10 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:11 pm to Charles Bronson
You are such a bad arse dude!! You're so much better than everyone and so independent just because you didn't like this movie.
you're fricking miserable
you're fricking miserable
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:15 pm to CRAZY 4 LSU
Who said I didn't like it? That's the problem with partially connected brains like you. You think because I criticize something I don't like it. I thought it was an mold fitted movie, but it had good performances by Leo and the Third Rock gay.
Did I think it was complicated and hard to follow? No. Did I think it deserves obsessive construction and destruction? Absolutely not. Its ideas are stolen from others, and in a very superficial way. I do not think anyone who has a decently functioning brain needs to see this movie again.
Yes, I saw most of this movie already when I saw Memento.
Did I think it was complicated and hard to follow? No. Did I think it deserves obsessive construction and destruction? Absolutely not. Its ideas are stolen from others, and in a very superficial way. I do not think anyone who has a decently functioning brain needs to see this movie again.
Yes, I saw most of this movie already when I saw Memento.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:17 pm to Charles Bronson
Cliff notes version, part 2:
I'm Charles Bronson, and I'm super smart. I talked shite about the movie but that doesn't mean I didn't like it. Did I mention how smart I was?
I'm Charles Bronson, and I'm super smart. I talked shite about the movie but that doesn't mean I didn't like it. Did I mention how smart I was?
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:17 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:At least we know who was first.
With the level of intelligentsia on this forum, the theme of this movie will be rehashed countless times in more ways than not, each time with a poster trying to prove his intelligence and education.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:18 pm to Charles Bronson
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:19 pm to Beastwood
Stop feeding the troll people. Let his threads sink and go away.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:27 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
What's not to love -- college intro level introductions to Kant, Descartes, Freud, Jung, and Kierkegaard. With the level of intelligentsia on this forum, the theme of this movie will be rehashed countless times in more ways than not, each time with a poster trying to prove his intelligence and education.
I love that your review basically does the latter with the skill of the former.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:45 pm to Tom288
quote:
I love that your review basically does the latter with the skill of the former.
BOOM
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:47 pm to Tom288
quote:
Charles Bronson
Thanks for your review. Don't listen to the haters on here; I love your reviews and can appreciate talented flaming when I see it. Keep it up.
Oh, and I loved Inception.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:50 pm to Charles Bronson
Don't feed the troll.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 5:59 pm to Charles Bronson
Pay NO ATTENTION to the man behind the curtain! For he is really no Charles Bronson (now there is someone who made intellectually challenging movies. (Ironic,eh)
I saw this movie today and will say it is a must see! I loved it!

I saw this movie today and will say it is a must see! I loved it!
Posted on 7/16/10 at 6:01 pm to Dead Mike
double post
This post was edited on 7/16/10 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 7/16/10 at 6:01 pm to Dead Mike
A beginner troll wants people to repeatedly post, "Don't feed the troll."
I am neither a beginner nor a troll. Because you disagree with my opinion yet do not have the words to refute or challenge with any eloquence you resort to calling me a troll and commanding others not to reply. Here's an idea, Movie Board Goebbels, let the people decide and speak for themselves.
P.S. Using former/latter to show some sort of wordsmanship is poorly played. I was using such novice techniques in seventh grade.
I am neither a beginner nor a troll. Because you disagree with my opinion yet do not have the words to refute or challenge with any eloquence you resort to calling me a troll and commanding others not to reply. Here's an idea, Movie Board Goebbels, let the people decide and speak for themselves.
P.S. Using former/latter to show some sort of wordsmanship is poorly played. I was using such novice techniques in seventh grade.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 6:03 pm to Charles Bronson
you could have done a review without being condescending to the people that really enjoyed the movie.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 6:10 pm to Charles Bronson
quote:
P.S. Using former/latter to show some sort of wordsmanship is poorly played. I was using such novice techniques in seventh grade.
Unfortunately you didn't learn how to properly use the word intelligentsia in the seventh grade.
P.S.
Wordsmanship is not a word.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 6:13 pm to Tom288
www.oed.com.
Sorry that your Webster's pocket 5,000 word dictionary is the only one you ever were taught.
Sorry that your Webster's pocket 5,000 word dictionary is the only one you ever were taught.
Posted on 7/16/10 at 6:14 pm to Charles Bronson
Actually I use the Oxford Dictionary.
And you can't be taught a dictionary. Did you mean taught how to use a dictionary?
And you can't be taught a dictionary. Did you mean taught how to use a dictionary?
This post was edited on 7/16/10 at 6:16 pm
Popular
Back to top

9





