- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Shocking betrayal of trust
Posted on 7/7/10 at 9:32 am
Posted on 7/7/10 at 9:32 am
This makes no sense whatsoever! All I can say is wow. :spaLINK
Posted on 7/7/10 at 9:56 am to Venicetiger
quote:
Okay, it turns out Senate Republicans are going to do the right thing and support giving officials the subpoena power to probe BP.
The Senate GOP leadership has decided they have no objections to legislation giving subpoena power to the White House commission probing the oil spill, and will not block the bill from moving forward, aides tell me. The move will cheer liberals and Dems who were hoping to move this towards passage quickly.
Last week the House near-unanimously passed legislation giving the commission that power, but yesterday, Senator Jim DeMint infuriated Democrats by putting a block on the legislation when a Dem brought it to the floor for a voice vote.
DeMint claimed he was doing this on behalf of unnamed GOP Senators in his caucus, prompting Dems to charge that Republicans were shielding Big Oil from a real probe.
But the Senate GOP leadership has informed DeMint's office that it has no objections to the legislation, and it will proceed, DeMint spokesman Wesley Denton tells me.
"Senator DeMint does not and will not have an objection to this legislation," says Denton. "He simply objected on behalf of other senators who had not been given time to review the bill. Now that they've had time to review it, it seems no one has an objection."
So why was this blocked yesterday?
According to a DeMint aide, he happened to be on the floor when a Democratic Senator introduced the bill for a voice vote. DeMint was told by GOP leadership aides to hold up the bill because leadership hadn't had a chance to read it, the DeMint aide says.
But now that the leadership has read the bill and decided it has no objections, it will move forward if a Dem asks again for it to be passed by unanimous consent.
In truth, it would have been politically very difficult for Republicans to block this. Their decision to let it move forward deprives Dems of a potent talking point. But it's a good development.
UPDATE, 4:17 p.m.: Don Stewart, a spokesman for Mitch McConnell, confirms that the leadership has no objections to the bill. "I don't know of any objections," he says. "What I do know is that there is bipartisan support."
LINK
I want to know who he was blocking this for
Posted on 7/7/10 at 10:34 am to Decatur
quote:
I want to know who he was blocking this for
The Obama administration and their Amen Chorus on Capitol Hill have made a practice of pushing through legislation without giving the Republicans an opportunity to review it thoroughly to see if it contains provisions that they find objectionable. Delaying a voice vote to allow members of Congress to be sure they know what's in the legislation sounds like nothing more than prudence in an institution where more of that would be a good thing.
This post was edited on 7/7/10 at 10:38 am
Posted on 7/7/10 at 5:45 pm to nycajun
quote:
The Obama administration and their Amen Chorus on Capitol Hill have made a practice of pushing through legislation without giving the Republicans an opportunity to review it thoroughly to see if it contains provisions that they find objectionable. Delaying a voice vote to allow members of Congress to be sure they know what's in the legislation sounds like nothing more than prudence in an institution where more of that would be a good thing.
If this had been an isolated occurrence, then you would have a valid point. However, the Republicans in this Senate have frozen more legislation and more filibusters than any other in history - do the Google search yourself, it's there. Their purpose isn't better legislation, it is to stop the President and Congress and then, when nothing gets done, complain how 'government doesn't work'.
Posted on 7/7/10 at 7:06 pm to LSU80 USF08
quote:
If this had been an isolated occurrence, then you would have a valid point. However, the Republicans in this Senate have frozen more legislation and more filibusters than any other in history
When you have the craziest president and leftest house in history can you blame them?
Posted on 7/7/10 at 8:24 pm to Junky
quote:
If this had been an isolated occurrence, then you would have a valid point. However, the Republicans in this Senate have frozen more legislation and more filibusters than any other in history
When you have the craziest president and leftest house in history can you blame them?
Yes, I absolutely blame them! It would be different if they had introduced better alternatives so that the issues could be debated, but instead they chose to try to shut things down. They had no better ideas. That's hardly being productive.
Popular
Back to top
1





