- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A&M Was Smart Enough To Figure They Were Not Being Asked To Join
Posted on 6/13/10 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 6/13/10 at 6:08 pm
Pac 10. They were being offered an invitation to join former WAC'ers Arizona and Arizona State in what could become the Big 12 South.
The Pac 10 carved out Arizona and Arizona State, both schools of which hold ONE Pac 10 football title between the two of them. ONE.
Cal, USC and Stanford are not going to sniff Texas Tech or OSU or OU but once every 6 years or so.
Let's just hope A&M stays in the 10 member Big 12 and plays us in non-conference.
Oh yes. Way to go Aggies. I'm proud you told UT to stick it.
The Pac 10 carved out Arizona and Arizona State, both schools of which hold ONE Pac 10 football title between the two of them. ONE.
Cal, USC and Stanford are not going to sniff Texas Tech or OSU or OU but once every 6 years or so.
Let's just hope A&M stays in the 10 member Big 12 and plays us in non-conference.
Oh yes. Way to go Aggies. I'm proud you told UT to stick it.
This post was edited on 6/13/10 at 6:09 pm
3
Posted on 6/13/10 at 6:12 pm to Touchdowns4LSU
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:34 pm to Duckie
In short, it would work out to two allied conferences, one consisting of the Big 12 schools and the two Zona schools, the other consisting of all the Cali, Oregon, and Washington schools.
There would be no conference championship game and they'd lobby hard to get two separate BCS bids, one for each champion. There would only be two east-west games per team each year, so you could go 8 years without seeing USC.
There would be no conference championship game and they'd lobby hard to get two separate BCS bids, one for each champion. There would only be two east-west games per team each year, so you could go 8 years without seeing USC.
This post was edited on 6/13/10 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:40 pm to teke184
Did you say A and M was smart enough...? C'mon
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:49 pm to teke184
quote:
In short, it would work out to two allied conferences, one consisting of the Big 12 schools and the two Zona schools, the other consisting of all the Cali, Oregon, and Washington schools.
There would be no conference championship game and they'd lobby hard to get two separate BCS bids, one for each champion. There would only be two east-west games per team each year, so you could go 8 years without seeing USC.
In short, it would work out to two allied conferences, one consisting of the Big 12 schools and the two Zona schools, the other consisting of all the Cali, Oregon, and Washington schools.
There would be no conference championship game and they'd lobby hard to get two separate BCS bids, one for each champion. There would only be two east-west games per team each year, so you could go 8 years without seeing USC.
I see, so this FAIL was due to wanting to hold onto both BCS berths.
These guys are soooo short sighted.
It would have been interesting if they had a champ game for the Pac's divisions.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:51 pm to teke184
quote:
In short, it would work out to two allied conferences, one consisting of the Big 12 schools and the two Zona schools, the other consisting of all the Cali, Oregon, and Washington schools.
Exactly. It would be a 'conference' in name only.
quote:
There would be no conference championship game and they'd lobby hard to get two separate BCS bids, one for each champion. There would only be two east-west games per team each year, so you could go 8 years without seeing USC.
Its a dumb as hell idea- west coasters would STILL have no reason to watch the former big 12 teams
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:51 pm to Touchdowns4LSU
since nothing is resolved, they can try again with another approach to the BCS bowl money.
I thought we might get a playoff out of the pac's finally.
the pacs and b10's are against the playoff concept.
They want to keep the status quo.
They are AFRAID OF CHANGE. They are closet conservatives even though they are in blue states.
I thought we might get a playoff out of the pac's finally.
the pacs and b10's are against the playoff concept.
They want to keep the status quo.
They are AFRAID OF CHANGE. They are closet conservatives even though they are in blue states.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:52 pm to Touchdowns4LSU
It will be a pseudo conference, not a real conference.
Posted on 6/13/10 at 7:56 pm to secfan123
quote:
west coasters would STILL have no reason to watch the former big 12 teams
with a cable network, it doesn't matter
Posted on 6/13/10 at 8:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
This entire thread is a lie. Please, provide a link that even remotely claims ANY of that from a credible source.
(Patiently waiting...)
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News