- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Can someone please post a summary or explanation
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:05 pm
of why the conferences are in such "apparent" turmoil?
I guess I have been under a rock..
All this talk is sort of crazy..
Are the proposed changes all about the money? If so, how do these changes benefit interested parties?
I don't get it
Please advise
I guess I have been under a rock..
All this talk is sort of crazy..
Are the proposed changes all about the money? If so, how do these changes benefit interested parties?
I don't get it
Please advise
This post was edited on 6/11/10 at 1:06 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:08 pm to ApexTiger
The SEC is making huge TV profits. The Pac-10 and Big-12 currently aren't because they have outdated contracts. They want to create a conference that covers a huge part of the country so they have leverage is negotiations, which could create over a 100% increase in TV revenue
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:09 pm to usc6158
USC v Texas Tech 9:30pm live on ESPN 8
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:11 pm to ApexTiger
1) months ago Big Ten fires first shot in a public arena. Openly talks about adding more schools to their conference. Motivations are probably primarily a) to convince Notre Dame to finally join the Big Ten and b) to add programs that may add market share/media value to their expanding Big Ten cable network - all of the programs being considered add markets and/or national attention.
2) Nebraska and Colorado are the first to act - Colorado has officially jumped to the PAC and Nebraska is supposedly about to officially jump to the Big 10 - all of this within the last week
3) At the same time as #2 - the PAC Commissioner seeks out reporters to put out the word they are interested in adding multiple schools from the Big 12 - esp Texas, A&M, T Tech, OU, OSU, and Colorado are the schools of interest
4) SEC commissioner Slive has apparently been talking in back channels to major players including at least Texas, A&M, OU, and Ok State over the last few months regarding their interest in heading to the SEC
5) Tons of other rumors
2) Nebraska and Colorado are the first to act - Colorado has officially jumped to the PAC and Nebraska is supposedly about to officially jump to the Big 10 - all of this within the last week
3) At the same time as #2 - the PAC Commissioner seeks out reporters to put out the word they are interested in adding multiple schools from the Big 12 - esp Texas, A&M, T Tech, OU, OSU, and Colorado are the schools of interest
4) SEC commissioner Slive has apparently been talking in back channels to major players including at least Texas, A&M, OU, and Ok State over the last few months regarding their interest in heading to the SEC
5) Tons of other rumors
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:14 pm to G4LSU
So if one conference makes more money than another..how does that really matter?
Who gets the money?
How does Watching Nebraska playing Penn St become more viewable than seeing them play OU?
Tradition is a good thing in College football.
The changes are very interesting and fun to ponder.
But CFB is pretty dang good they way it is..I hope they don't mess it up chasing the dollar
Who gets the money?
How does Watching Nebraska playing Penn St become more viewable than seeing them play OU?
Tradition is a good thing in College football.
The changes are very interesting and fun to ponder.
But CFB is pretty dang good they way it is..I hope they don't mess it up chasing the dollar
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:17 pm to ApexTiger
quote:
So if one conference makes more money than another..how does that really matter?
more money is a competitive advantage - esp the more money and longer the period of time we are talking about
The big 10 will probably share out comfortably over 20 million per year to Nebraska - in the Big 12 they would have made around 10 million from the conference
Esp over 5-10 years that's a substantial difference that changes programs
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:24 pm to molsusports
quote:
The big 10 will probably share out comfortably over 20 million per year to Nebraska - in the Big 12 they would have made around 10 million from the conference
that is huge..
Do you have link to support these numbers?
I have a good freind who is a huge N fan.
Thanks
Posted on 6/11/10 at 1:32 pm to ApexTiger
Take all these stories with some grains of salt - because you will see slightly different numbers from story to story and that's partly because some are counting different revenue.
But the bottom line is PAC and Big 12 schools have been making a lot less from their conferences than have SEC and Big 10 schools.
And that money gap is something that motivates
espn commentary
But the bottom line is PAC and Big 12 schools have been making a lot less from their conferences than have SEC and Big 10 schools.
And that money gap is something that motivates
espn commentary
quote:
With that large population base, the new conference would start its own network and, along with other broadcast partners, likely would distribute around $20 million per member, comparable broadcast revenue to the Big Ten ($22 million) and SEC ($17 million), the source said.
The Big 12 distributed $7 million to $12 million a year. The Pac-10 distributed $8 million to $10 million.
Popular
Back to top
3





